This Is What It Takes to Hit 35 MPG in Our Hyundai Santa Fe Hybrid
With our long-term fuel economy averaging a dismal 25 mpg, we set out to match the EPA highway and city ratings in the real world.

Our long-term Hyundai Santa Fe Hybrid’s fuel economy has been disappointing. The EPA rating on the window sticker sets high expectations, suggesting this three-row SUV can stretch up to 35 miles out of a gallon of gas, yet through 13,283 miles, we’re averaging just 25.3 mpg.
0:00 / 0:00
I can’t say I’m surprised. The real world is harder on small-displacement turbocharged engines than the EPA’s laboratory fuel-economy test, especially when that engine is tasked with pushing a big, slab-sided box through the air. You hear that and feel that in the Santa Fe as the boosted 1.6-liter I-4 regularly revs over 5,000 rpm during easy part-throttle acceleration even with the electric motor pitching in to help.
Of course, it would be disingenuous to place all the blame for our lousy fuel economy on the Santa Fe. The idiot behind the wheel—hi, there!—is the biggest variable in real-world fuel economy, and I can confidently say (without a single shred of evidence) that I drive our long-term Hyundai harder and faster than the average Santa Fe buyer. The good news is that I can control my impulses. Most of the time. Unless there’s Oreos involved.

Lately I’ve been wondering what it would take to match the Santa Fe’s EPA fuel economy in real-world conditions. What if I didn’t drive like me? I could do that, at least for a little bit. So I put on my lightest pair of shoes and set out on two drives, on the highway and in the city, to figure out just how gingerly you need to drive to make the window sticker fuel economy come true.
In Pursuit of the Hyundai Santa Fe Hybrid’s 34 Highway MPG
Pull onto any of the major interstates slicing through Metro Detroit, and you’d think driving fast is the official recreational activity of the state of Michigan. (It’s actually eating cured meats.) Do the speed limit on I-96, and you might as well be pedaling a Schwinn. That construction zone sign? That’s your sign to speed up—there’s nowhere for the cops to lay a trap. Yes, that’s a dumb and offensive thing to say, but I don’t make the rules here. That’s just how the place works.
I’ll have to break Michigan’s unspoken rules of the road if I’m ever going to match the Santa Fe’s 34-mpg highway rating. I won’t be doing 80 mph, or 75 mph, or even the speed limit of 70 mph. From studying the onboard trip computer over the past several months, I know the rectilinear Santa Fe will force me to drive under the speed limit on the highway for the first time since I took my driving test.

With a full tank of gas and a scientific commitment to going slow, I merge onto I-94, Michigan’s major east-west trucking corridor, and end up side-by-side with a semi hauling something that’s both flammable and capable of zapping you with dangerously high voltage according to the warning stickers. Normally I’d put my foot to the floor and nope out of there with the Santa Fe’s engine buzzing. Instead, I lift off the accelerator and tuck in behind the semi’s load.
I use the Santa Fe’s fuel economy readout to pick my speed. I’m targeting 36 mpg since I know from experience that the car tends to be overly optimistic. After fluctuating between 60 and 70 mph, I land on a 65-mph cruise. It’s not as painfully slow as I expected even though it quickly becomes clear I’m the slowest noncommercial vehicle on the road. In a 100-mile span, I pass exactly six vehicles, including one box truck with “Max Speed 63” scratched into the dirt-covered roll-up door. I get excited when I pass an Amazon Prime semi and a GMC Sierra pulling a camper only to realize they’re clogged up behind two 16-foot-wide mobile homes being moved down the highway with the help of a couple pilot cars. Once I make it around the rolling bottleneck, the Amazon truck and GMC pass me back.

I pull into the gas station with the Santa Fe showing 36.8 mpg. My GPS data logger reveals I’ve averaged 64 mph, which is at least 10 mph below what I naturally would have driven. I open my phone’s calculator app to divide miles driven by gallons of gas used only to discover I wasn’t conservative enough. I’ve averaged 33.0 mpg, one whole mpg short of the EPA label. To hit 34 mpg, I needed to knock off even more speed. How much exactly? Dunno. I don’t plan to drive that slow on a 70-mph interstate anytime soon.
