Mercedes-Benz Vision EQXX First Ride: Mercedes’ Megameter EV
This swoopy sedan crossed the Alps, went 87 mph on the autobahn, and finished a 1,000-km drive with juice left in its 100-kWh pack.Behold the most efficient Mercedes ever: the Vision EQXX. On Tuesday, April 5, this experimental concept car drove 626 miles—or 1,007 km, just over a megameter—from its birthplace in Stuttgart, Germany, up and over the 6,900-foot Gotthard Pass in Switzerland to the French Riviera on a single 100-kWh battery charge. The car averaged 56 mph by strictly adhering to all speed limits, peaking at 87 mph on a no-limit stretch of autobahn. They made two 15-minute bio-break stops, arriving in Cassis having consumed only 88 percent of the battery with 87 miles of range remaining (certified by German TÜV authorities). We traveled to the Nice design center that penned the exquisite EQXX to learn how this impressive feat was accomplished and to get a sense of how close the forthcoming EQC sedan might come to achieving similar results.
0:00 / 0:00
Prioritizing Efficiency Efforts
The overarching goal set for the EQXX team was to achieve a single-digit kWh/100 km consumption figure (9 kWh/100 km=233 mpg-e). The Riviera Run yielded an overachieving 8.7 kWh/100 km (241 mpg-e). The team prioritized its efforts proportionately to the forces acting on such an electric compact sedan at speed: 62 percent of the energy expended goes to overcome aerodynamic forces, 20 percent to overcoming the vehicle's weight and rolling resistance, and 18 percent goes to drivetrain losses.
Lowest Drag Without Fender Skirts
Aero was obviously the development team's No. 1 priority, and wheels are a huge problem (front wheels typically create one-third of a sedan's aero drag). The easiest (and ugliest) way to fix this is by faring the wheels into the bodywork with skirts or spats, but the team in Nice managed to minimize wheel drag with very smooth, unvented wheel covers, by specifying the tire sidewall contours and demanding all labeling be carved into the rubber, not embossed on it, and by insetting the rear wheels almost 2 inches relative to the fronts, putting them in the "wind shadow" of the front wheels. The considerable plan-view taper of the greenhouse makes possible those sensuous rear shoulders that mask this "design don't" (it also benefits aero), but at considerable cost to rear seat shoulder room.
The next biggest aero advance (good for 0.01 Cd) is the rear diffuser, which extends almost 8 inches and drops down 3 degrees at speeds above 35 mph to work with the rest of the sharp edge that rings the tail of the vehicle to manage airflow separation and minimize drag-inducing turbulence. The rest of the story is more conventional: smooth underbelly and A-pillars, smaller, more aerodynamic mirrors, an underbody "cooling plate" that rejects heat directly to air passing under the car, meeting most of the vehicle's cooling needs so the conventional radiator need only be used for climate control or extreme heat. That's fed by shuttered openings in the lower grille that exhausts air through hood vents. The end result: a drag coefficient below 0.17 and a frontal area of 2.10 square meters for a total drag reduction of 29 percent relative to the EQS sedan (0.20, 2.51 sq m).




