How Big Is the Ford Maverick, Anyway?

Our yearlong review Maverick Hybrid had us wondering how its size stacked up to trucks from the ’70s, ’80s, ’90s, and today.

Writer
MotorTrend StaffPhotographer
2024 Ford Maverick front view 88

We’ve had our Ford Maverick for just over 18 months at this point, and they’re thick on the ground in the Detroit area where our truck lives. Even seeing them coming and going frequently, the perception of just how big they are seems to change. Sometimes the Maverick looks positively tiny; other times, much larger. To satisfy our curiosity about where the Maverick falls on the scale, we did some deep research to pull out comparables from the 1970s, ’80s, ’90s—the compact pickup’s heydays—and today. As the Maverick was just refreshed for 2025 (including a street truck version), we’ve used that model year for comparison and noted the spec differences of our 2023 long-term truck in the footnotes.

Maverick vs. Today’s Compact Truck

There’s only one truck in the Maverick’s class today: the Hyundai Santa Cruz. But even though they share a class, their executions differ quite a lot. The Hyundai leans more into its SUV roots in terms of styling and its level of luxury, while the Ford is more truckish in features and looks. The Santa Cruz is a fine little trucklet, but we prefer the Maverick’s more honest, rough-and-tumble approach. That said, the Hyundai does offer more power and torque with its top-spec powertrain.

VS. CURRENT COMPACT TRUCKS

LENGTH (in)

WIDTH (in)

HEIGHT (in)

WHEELBASE (in)

PAYLOAD (lb)

TOWING (lb)

HP

TORQUE

BASE PRICE

2025 Ford Maverick

199.8-200.6*

72.6

67.7-69.4†

121.1

1,045–1,500**

2,000-4,000

191-238††

155-275§

$27,990

2025 Hyundai Santa Cruz

195.7-195.9

75

66.7

118.3

1,616-1,744

1,653-5,000

191-281

181-311

$30,100

Maverick vs. Today’s Midsize Trucks

It also seemed worth seeing how the Maverick stacks up against today’s midsize trucks, including the Chevrolet Colorado, Nissan Frontier, Toyota Tacoma, and its Ford Ranger sibling. They’re all larger, of course—about 1 to 2 feet longer, 3 to 8 inches wider, and 6 inches to 1 foot taller—and the Nissan and Toyota offer the choice of multiple wheelbases. They can all tow more, as well, but the Maverick is in the ballpark in terms of payload.

VS. CURRENT MIDSIZE TRUCKS

LENGTH (in)

WIDTH (in)

HEIGHT (in)

WHEELBASE (in)

PAYLOAD (lb)

TOWING (lb)

HP

TORQUE

BASE PRICE

2025 Ford Maverick

199.8-200.6*

72.6

67.7-69.4†

121.1

1,045–1,500**

2,000-4,000

191-238††

155-275§

$27,990

2025 Chevrolet Colorado

212.7-213.2

74.9-78.1

78.8-81.9

131.4

1,151-1,684

3,500-7,700

237-310

259-430

$33,495

2025 Ford Ranger

210.6-210.9

75.5-79.0

74.4-75.9

128.7

1,375-1,805

5,510-7500

270-405

310-430

$34,575

2025 Nissan Frontier

210.2-224.1

73.0-74.7

71.3-72.9

126.0-139.8

1,020-1,620

6,310-7,150

310

281

$33,560

2025 Toyota Tacoma

213.0-227.4

76.9-77.9

73.8-75.8

131.9–145.1

1,230-1,710

3,500-6,500

228-326

243-465

$33,085

Maverick vs. 1990s Compact Trucks

Now here’s where things got really interesting. The Maverick is longer than compact trucks from the 1990s (which is when I got my driver’s license), outside of the long-wheelbase Chevy S-10. It’s also wider and taller and can haul and tow about as well as the bunch. So if you ever looked at a ’97 Ranger or S-10 and thought it looked tiny, you were right, at least in comparison to the Maverick.

We also adjusted the 2025 Maverick’s base price to 1997 dollars, and it’s about 10 to 15 percent more expensive. Given the modern Ford’s fuel efficiency gains, feature set, power and torque, and massive leaps in comfort and refinement, that’s not surprising—and a premium we’d gladly pay in a fantasy land where these trucks are for sale alongside one another.

VS. 1990s COMPACT TRUCKS

LENGTH (in)

WIDTH (in)

HEIGHT (in)

WHEELBASE (in)

PAYLOAD (lb)

TOWING (lb)

HP

TORQUE

BASE PRICE

2025 Ford Maverick

199.8-200.6*

72.6

67.7-69.4†

121.1

1,045–1,500**

2,000-4,000

191-238††

155-275§

$14,280•

1997 Chevrolet S-10

189.0-205.0

67.9

62.1-62.2

108.3-122.9

1,196-1,727

2,000-6,000

118-190

130-250

$12,113

1997 Ford Ranger

184.3-198.2

69.4

63.6

108.1-125.0

1,200

4,500

112-160

135-220

$11,380

1997 Toyota Tacoma

199.0

66.5

66.9

121.9

1,582

5,000

190

220

$12,658

Maverick vs. 1980s Compact Trucks

In the 1980s, the biggest compact trucks were about a foot shorter overall than their 1990s counterparts, but the older trucks were even smaller on the other end of the spectrum. In fact, the modern Ford Maverick is more than 2 feet longer than the short-wheelbase, regular cab Isuzu P’up and Toyota Pickup models, and no truck in this sample set stretches within 6 inches of a Maverick. This era also saw the domestic companies starting to develop small trucks for America themselves. As a result, the available models were a mix of fresh trucks like the S-10 and Ranger and older Japanese (and rebadged Japanese) models.

The modern Ford also has them all handily beat in terms of output; the most powerful of the bunch is still 81 horses shy. It was also the era of double-digit base horsepower. These little trucks could tow and haul with the Maverick, though, thanks to body-on-frame architecture and a general lack of relative curb weight thanks to skimpier feature sets and less robust crash structure. And here’s something that several of the trucks have on the Ford Maverick: an available diesel engine. The price gap has grown to about 30 percent.

VS. 1980s COMPACT TRUCKS

LENGTH (in)

WIDTH (in)

HEIGHT (in)

WHEELBASE (in)

PAYLOAD (lb)

TOWING (lb)

HP

TORQUE

BASE PRICE

2025 Ford Maverick

199.8-200.6*

72.6

67.7-69.4†

121.1

1,045–1,500**

2,000-4,000

191-238††

155-275§

$9,260•

1984 Chevrolet S-10

178.2-192.8

64.7

61.3-63.4

108.3-122.9

1,000-1,625

up to 5,000

62-110

96-145

$6,798

1984 Datsun/Nissan 720

186.4-192.5

63.4-66.3

61.0-67.9

101.4-110.8

N/A

1.000-2,000

61-103

117-134

$6,194

1984 Dodge Ram 50

184.6

65.0

59.6-60.6

109.4

1,500

3,500

90-108

N/A

$5,684

1984 Ford Ranger

175.6-187.6

66.9

64.0-67.1

107.9-113.9

1,220-2,225

up to 5,100

74-90

105-130

$6,827

1984 Isuzu P'up

174.2-191.3

63.0

61

104.3-117.9

N/A

N/A

58-82

95-101

$6,181

1984 Toyota Pickup

174.0-193.0

66.0

60.0-67.0

103.5-121.5

1,400-1,800

3,500-5,000

97-108

137-140

$6,188

Maverick vs. 1970s Compact Trucks

Here’s where the really small trucks come into play: The Ford Maverick is a full 31 inches longer than a basic 1975 Toyota truck, and even the longest base compact truck here is more than 2 feet shorter. All of the older trucks hail from Japan, as the Chevy was an Isuzu and the Ford was a Mazda. The Maverick towers over each of our ’70s trucks by 6 inches or more, and it outguns them by as much as 117 horsepower, a huge gap when you’re talking 74 versus 191. But slow as these old mini trucks were, they could still nearly equal the Mav in terms of payload. Impressive considering they were cheaper still relative to the Maverick’s converted price.

Unfortunately, reliable towing numbers (and payload in the case of the Toyota) proved essentially impossible to come by. If you have reliable sources—brochures, service manuals, etc., not forums—that can fill in or correct any of the numbers in this story, please send me photos in an e-mail and I’ll update this story.

VS. 1970s COMPACT TRUCKS

LENGTH (in)

WIDTH (in)

HEIGHT (in)

WHEELBASE (in)

PAYLOAD (lb)

TOWING (lb)

HP

TORQUE

BASE PRICE

2025 Ford Maverick

199.8-200.6*

72.6

67.7-69.4†

121.1

1,045–1,500**

2,000-4,000

191-238††

155-275§

$4,820•

1975 Chevrolet LUV

173.4

63.0

60.8

102.4

1,460

N/A

75

88

$2,976

1975 Datsun 620

169.2

62.5

60.8

101.1

1,441

N/A

96-112

100-108

$3,359

1975 Ford Courier

172.0

61.6

61.6

104.3

1,455

N/A

74

92

$3,146

1975 Toyota Pickup

168.7-184.6

62.2

61.2

101.6-110.0

N/A

N/A

96

120

$3,379

How Our Maverick Is Doing

Back to the present for an update on our 2023 Ford Maverick Hybrid XLT. It continues to chug along as a faithful servant. It occasionally sits and waits while we’re driving new test cars but hasn’t failed to start or given us any issues. Another two recalls found our mailbox, however, the first for possible taillight failure and the second for a rearview camera image that may freeze. Neither issue has affected our truck, but the first has already been repaired via software reflash. No fix is available yet for the other. One warranty repair was performed for a roof seal that slightly worked its way loose.

We recently put on a set of Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 winter tires to get us through the icier months in Michigan, and the little Ford truck hasn’t let us down, once again proving what we already know: A good set of winter tires is more helpful than all-wheel drive, all other things being equal. We’re still seeing about 35 mpg overall—once again, blame the 75-to-80-mph highway commutes that dominate its runtime—and no other problems have cropped up.

KEY

*2022-2024 Maverick: 199.7-200.7 in

†2022-2024 Maverick: 68.7-69.5 in

**2022-2024 Maverick: 1,200-1,500 lb

††2022-2024 Maverick: 191-250 hp

§2022-2024 Maverick: 155-277 lb-ft

•adjusted for model year of compared trucks

More on Our Long-Term 2023 Ford Maverick Hybrid:

MotorTrend's 2023 Ford Maverick Hybrid XLT

Service Life

18 mo/19,798 mi

Base/As Tested Price

$25,950/$30,355

Options

XLT Luxury package ($1,730: 8-way power driver seat; 6-way manual passenger seat; 110V inverter w/ cab and bed outlets; heated mirrors, seats, and steering wheel; LED bed lighting; trailer hitch w/ 4-pin connector; windshield wiper deicer), roll-up hard tonneau cover ($1,200); Ford Co-Pilot360 ($650; blind-spot monitoring, cross-traffic alert, lane keep alert and assist, driver drowsiness alert); spray-in bedliner ($495); rubber floor liners with carpeted mats ($175); manual rear sliding window ($155)

EPA CTY/HWY/CMB FUEL ECON; CMB RANGE

40/33/37 mpg; 511 miles

Average Fuel Econ

34.5 mpg

Energy Cost Per Mile

$0.12

Maintenance and Wear

$322.95 ($91.32: oil and filter change, tire rotation, inspection at 11,500 miles; $114.91, reinstall and balance all-season tires; $116.72: oil change and inspection at 20,000 miles)

Damage

$174.11 (replacement right rear Continental ProContact TX tire, $141.00 + tax, installation, and disposal of flat)

Days Out of Service/Without Loaner

18/0

Delights

Holding up extremely well, clever interior packaging and design, efficient for commuting, tidy size for parking, bed is larger and even more versatile than it seems.

Annoyances

Recalls piling up, some interior rattles

Recalls

7: (1) Engine failure may cause fire; remedy involved updating software for powertrain control module. (2) Emissions control system might operate inaccurately if heating element used to warm up a sensor does not function properly due to software error; remedy involved updating software in powertrain control module and related modules. (3) Air/fuel mixture calibration may malfunction at max speed or max speed with MyKey function; remedy involved reprogramming powertrain control module. (4) Turn-signal outage detection system may not alert driver if only one of the two bulbs per side in the rear signals has failed; remedy involved reflash of the body control module. (5) Instrument panel cluster may not illuminate, rendering warnings and gauges unreadable; remedy involved updating instrument panel cluster software. (6) Improperly calibrated body control module (BCM) may falsely detect current overload on one or both taillamps, rendering them inoperable; remedy involves updated BCM software. (7) Rearview camera image may freeze; remedy will involve module software update.

Erik Johnson fell in love with cars before he could talk, carrying that passion through graduation from the University of Michigan. He's led digital content for Automobile and Car and Driver, and now oversees print and digital content for MotorTrend. He still pinches himself every day.

Read More

Share

You May Also Like

Related MotorTrend Content: Entertainment | Politics | Business | Sports | News: News | World