2026 Mazda CX-5 First Drive: Better in Every Way (Except One)
More space and stunning infotainment lead the highlights but there’s one thing we’d improve ASAP.
It seems like every review of every Mazda SUV goes something like this: “Great to drive, nice interior, too bad the back seat and/or trunk is so small.” Mazda finally addressed that issue for its all-new, bigger 2026 CX-5, but the latest model also introduces a new interface that turns its back on years of Mazda tradition. Has Mazda solved the CX-5’s problems, or has it made them worse?
0:00 / 0:00
Big Stretch, Modest Gains
The 2026 CX-5 gets its first new platform since the original was introduced in 2013, and my, CX-5, how you’ve grown. The new iteration is 4.5 inches longer, 0.6 inch wider, and just over an inch taller than the old CX-5, with a 4.8-inch wheelbase stretch. This puts the CX-5 within an inch of the burlier CX-50’s dimensions, though Mazda execs insist the CX-50 is a very different vehicle that attracts a very different buyer. (We’d expect them to say nothing less.)
On paper, interior growth seems less dramatic, with an extra inch of legroom over the old model if you combine the front and rear seats. That puts it squarely in the middle of the compact SUV segment, far from both the limo-like Kia Sportage/Hyundai Tucson cousins and the (relatively) cramped Toyota RAV4. The CX-5’s cargo volume—33.7 cubic feet, up from 30.8—still trails most of its competitors, but overall interior volume is now in the upper half of the segment. More important, the CX-5 feels roomier. Mazda has fitted larger rear doors, which allow for easier access and make the back seat feel less claustrophobic. The tailgate is bigger, too, and the folding rear seats have a useful 40/20/40 split, though they stop short of folding completely flat and level.
Happily, the focus on practicality has had little effect on the CX-5’s sense of style. As we’ve come to expect from Mazda, the new CX-5’s interior is built from class-above materials. Upholstery choices include cloth and both fake and genuine leather, and as for the quality of the switchgear, well, there really isn’t any. Most of the controls have been moved to the center screen (more on that in a bit).
Still Drives Like a Mazda, But What’s With the Steering?
Yes, brand fans, that Mazda motoring magic is still intact. You might not feel it when you put your foot to the floor, as the new CX-5 carries over the outgoing version’s 2.5-liter naturally aspirated four and six-speed automatic, with all-wheel drive standard (yay, Mazda!). Horsepower is the same at 187, but torque rises by 0.5 percent—that’s 1 lb-ft—to 186. The last CX-5 we tested chugged from 0 to 60 mph in 8.2 seconds, and we expect the new CX-5, with a similar curb weight, to turn in a similar performance. Its EPA-rated fuel economy (24/30 mpg city/highway) is on par with that of its Hyundai and Kia competitors but trails the miserly Honda CR-V and Subaru Forester.
On the road, its six-speed auto feels a bit archaic, largely because it is, but the CX-5 accelerates smartly to freeway speeds and keeps up its pace in the curves. Those who crave more power will have to wait for the 2027 model year when Mazda will add a hybrid powertrain to the CX-5. The new hybrid is an all-new, in-house-designed system as opposed to the Toyota-sourced powertrain in the CX-50 Hybrid.
While the new CX-5 has been tuned for a more compliant ride than the old model (it’s commendably quiet and refined), it still leans toward the sporty end of the spectrum, just as we expect from a Mazda. The chassis engineers used some nifty technical tricks to enhance the SUV’s driving feel. Nothing artificial, mind you, such as introducing extra resistance into the steering at key moments. But rather, the engineers used their control over the powertrain to shift weight as needed, loading the suspension in response to driver inputs and thereby enabling the chassis to deliver feedback as promptly as possible. Pick up your speed on a curvy road, and the CX-5 delivers excellent seat-of-the-pants feedback, delivering a livestream of road-surface data directly to your butt cheeks.
Unfortunately, your fingers get no such treat, as its heavy steering mutes the feedback. It’s like trying to read braille while wearing gloves made of the same thick leather that wraps the steering wheel. You can tell there’s information out there, like a far-away ship whose silhouette you can just barely make out through the fog, but there are no discernible details. That’s a shame; we’d like the steering wheel to communicate with our hands as well as the suspension communicates with our backsides.





