Full-Size SUVs for Less Than $100K: 2026 Ford Expedition vs. Nissan Armada vs. Jeep Grand Wagoneer vs. GMC Yukon Denali Comparison

These four full-size SUVs come with three rows and loads of cabin space. Which one should you buy?

WriterPhotographer

In the land of big roads, there are even bigger expectations for vehicles that traverse them. Full-size SUVs aren’t the strongest sellers, but customers who need or want the space appreciate their existence. And—not that this is cheap—you don’t need to spend more than $100,000 to get into one. For 2026, the Ford Expedition, Nissan Armada, Jeep Grand Wagoneer, and GMC Yukon Denali all offer three rows and a variety of interpretations of an SUV for the family on the go.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

Of course, there’s no getting around the sheer size or fuel-economy ratings when you consider buying a car this big. With value and efficiency in mind, which one of the four full-size SUVs we just mentioned presents the best overall package?

Let’s Talk Numbers

Six- and eight-cylinder engines rule this space; no engineer would trust a gasping four-cylinder to adequately motivate these body-on-frame mountains. Four-wheel drive comes as standard across them all. You can see all the engine sizes and outputs listed in the spec chart at the end of this story, but just for fun, the Jeep Grand Wagoneer is the quickest to 60 mph at 5.4 seconds, with the Nissan Armada’s 6.3 seconds being the slowest.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

The Armada, at 6,082 pounds, is the heaviest member of this comparison field. It’s followed by the 6,079-pound Grand Wagoneer, the 6,032-pound GMC Yukon Denali, and the 5,844-pound Ford Expedition. And although we did not get to try out hauling and towing capacities during this test, the Ford can manage 1,344 and 9,200 pounds, the GMC 1,450 and 8,000 pounds, the Jeep 1,321 and 10,000 pounds, and the Nissan 1,466 and 8,500 pounds.

As for fuel economy, something that ought to be on everyone’s mind: The Jeep has the best mileage of 17/23/19 mpg city/highway/combined, followed by the Ford’s 15/22/18 mpg, then the Nissan’s 17/19/16 mpg, and ending with the GMC’s 14/18/16 mpg.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

We promised you prices of less than $100,000, so here they are. The Ford’s $77,045 Platinum 4x4 base price rises to $84,495 thanks to its Stealth Performance package. The GMC Yukon Denali 4WD, at $86,195 to start, is the most expensive vehicle here and made even more pricier after the Denali Reserve package bumps the as-tested price to $99,115. The Jeep Grand Wagoneer Limited Reserve 4x4’s $82,755 swells to just $84,750 after the heavy-duty trailer/tow package. And after ProPilot Assist 2.1 and two-tone exterior paint, the Nissan Armada Platinum Reserve 4WD’s base price of $82,795 jumps to $89,100.

Welcome to My Rolling Home

You may configure all these SUVs with a second-row bench seat to increase passenger capacity to eight people, but our test vehicles came equipped with second-row captain’s chairs for seven-passenger seating. Each of the various outboard rear seats gets various combinations of their own cupholders, USB charging ports, and climate vents. Everything tested here was dressed in the nicest leathers available from their respective order books.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

To begin, all of our assembled drivers were impressed by the 2026 Nissan Armada’s cabin materials and soft and supportive seats. The Armada is a great place to sit, with the front seats providing plenty of lateral support and the second row feeling equally luxurious. In exchange for those comfortable seats, you must sacrifice the ability to fold them flat. The second row’s floor-mounted phone tray and cupholder combination might get in the way of people walking between the seats to get to the third row. No doubt owing to its shortest length, the Armada also felt like it had the most cramped interior, especially in the third row. There, knee room is compromised, and taller MotorTrend testers reported their heads touching the headliner in the normal seating position, lending to a claustrophobic feeling. At least there’s power recline.

From the driver’s seat, we felt like we were perched atop the car because of how high we could raise the seat. Of the four, the Armada also has the best physical climate controls, offering a wealth of clearly labeled hard buttons. We’re confident an owner will be able to adjust everything with minimal downward glances, given enough time to learn the layout. The panoramic screen sits well within the driver’s eyeline, and Nissan’s latest software and user interface is more responsive, easier to use, and more attractive than before.

Out of the Nissan and into the GMC Yukon Denali, we were disappointed by the featureless, hard, and thin seats that felt at odds with the vehicle’s high price tag. Third-row access is easy, and comfort is acceptable even for tall passengers, but their knees will rest slightly above their hips. However, there is a small pad beneath the window for elbows, and the leathers and stitching do extend to the third row, which isn’t always the case. Our drivers were split when it came to the cabin materials—some felt it looked cheap and tacky; others thought it was appropriate for the Denali trim. And even if the second-row media screens are great for entertainment, we worry about someone accidentally grasping them as a handhold to get in and out of the car.

We all agreed the large, vertical central screen wasn’t it. We appreciated the rubbery climate buttons at the bottom, but you still must move your eyes quite far from the road to use them. As with everything it touches, Super Cruise continues to impress, particularly in this application. It turns humdrum highway time into something you actually look forward to.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

The 2026 Ford Expedition started things off well by offering a fun surprise: a sliding center console that reveals room for bulkier items that would have otherwise ended up in a footwell somewhere. It also means second-row passengers can have their cupholders closer or farther away, though it comes at the expense of third-row access for the aisle walkers. We weren’t bothered by the plain, black interior, as the comfortable seats more than made up for it. The second-row chairs give off big La-Z-Boy energy. Third-row seating, with its flat floor, is also comfortable, but the inexplicably ceiling-mounted middle seat belt knocked some heads here and there. Also, where are people supposed to rest their elbows? In the cupholders?

Count us as fans of the unconventional dual-screen layout. All important information is up top, and you can customize both screens. A minor gripe: We noticed if the sun is exactly overhead, the driver’s information screen reflects a lovely image of your own knuckles on the oblong steering wheel right back at you. The touchpads on the steering wheel? We’re for them. They induce a pop-up menu on the screen, so the wheel remains less cluttered. BlueCruise, while still second to Super Cruise, is activated easily with a couple of button presses.

As for the split-tailgate trunk, I was the only tester who liked it. I think it offers an extra level of utility (especially relevant since we’ve learned the new BMW X5 won’t offer the feature). However, everyone else either had a take-it-or-leave-it attitude or thought the feature gave the rear a swollen-lip look.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

Finally, into the cavernous 2026 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. Those big windows let in so much light and visibility, even for third-row passengers who usually suffer from obstructing C-pillars. If that isn’t enough, those passengers even get their own dedicated sunroof. Throw in power seats, power recline, a button to push the second-row seat forward with ease, and space for adults over long drives, and this is the best third row of the bunch. “The third-row experience overall is great even before considering the LWD model,” Buyer’s Guide director Zach Gale said. The trade-off is that trunk space is on the small side if the third row is upright.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

We reject the tons of gloss-black used near the front-seat controls but are grateful for the physical climate controls. The rest of the driver experience is straightforward, but there’s something off kilter about the screen. It needs to be angled toward the driver more, or pushed back a bit, or positioned a little higher. The same goes for the buttons down near the transmission’s selector dial. Why would these be angled away from the driver?

Moving Castles

The Nissan Armada is a body-on-frame rig, and it won’t let you forget it. For all the luxurious appointments inside, it rides and handles like an old truck. You feel and hear seemingly every bump, crack, and hole in the road as they shudder through the cabin. Steering is ponderous and heavy, which isn’t always the worst thing, but it stands out among the peppier competition. On the other hand, it does help build a connection with the road because it feels appropriate for how big the SUV is.

The Armada brought with it the twin-turbo V-6, which feels appropriately powerful. There’s plenty of low-end torque, and power delivery is linear despite the turbos. The SUV gets up to speed easily and holds it effortlessly. On a smooth stretch of highway, the ride is nice and quiet. Brake feel is progressive, and the pedal yields good bite, but the amount of extra and unnecessary motion the suspension transmits is inescapable.

GMC has been making the Yukon Denali since the late 1900s, so you could almost say this 2026 version has heritage. As such, it’s the only SUV in this comparison with a V-8 and feels distinctly old-school because of it. Like a familiar pair of jeans, there’s a coziness to this setup we know won’t ever lose its appeal. The V-8 grumble, its torque off the line, a smidge of nose lift, effortless cruising—these are all hallmarks of full-size American SUV. Only needing to drop one gear to maintain speed up a steep hill, it powers through highway ramps to get up to speed immediately to cruise, and cruise well.

On local roads, there’s a pleasant sense of smallness compared to the others thanks to tight body control. The ride can get a little crashy over choppy pavement, but overall, the suspension eats up bumps with only some small body trembles in response. The brakes operate smoothly but could use a little more feel. That said, fuel economy is the biggest demerit earner here. The 14/18/16 mpg ratings are pretty atrocious no matter how you look at them, especially when more efficient but equally capable powertrains exist. If you must have the Yukon, GMC will sell you one with a diesel engine that delivers better fuel economy.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

By contrast, the Expedition’s V-6 feels like the newest and most animated powertrain; there’s no question it can haul ass. Like the Armada, the linear power delivery hides the turbos, and once acceleration is completed, it settles down happily over highway miles. It even keeps its composure over broken pavement, though not as well as the GMC. The Expedition drives like a smaller rig than it is, and as a result it won’t leave you fatigued even after a long time behind the wheel. We think this is due to the seat comfort.

Braking could use more urgency, and there are unfortunately some massive blind spots to be mindful about. We have no problem with the steering wheel’s unusual shape, but it feels too small for the massive Ford. We felt like we had to unwind it 17 times after making a tight turn, as evidenced by its 3.6 turns lock to lock. The others only need 3.2 and 3.1 turns. Fuel economy likewise isn’t stellar, but it returns all right efficiency on the highway.

The Hurricane engine in the Grand Wagoneer continues to impress us. Possessing the effortlessness of the Yukon’s V-8, the inline-six is so much smoother. Long drives are comfortable, and when it’s time to stop, the brakes glide the heavy body back down with ease. But whereas the Ford and GMC feel like they shrink around you, the Jeep always seems gargantuan. It’s stressful to drive this SUV in tight parking lots, and as the longest vehicle in this comparison test, it requires many multipoint turns wherever it goes. Those proximity sensors aren’t an option; they’re a requirement.

Steering is rather loose and numb, and ride quality away from well-paved roads isn’t great, either. The front suspension feels like it runs out of travel over the biggest bumps, and although the ride is generally better than the Nissan’s, the body still shudders over broken pavement. How the Grand Wagoneer was originally benchmarked against premium and luxury SUVs during development is a mystery to us. “Honestly, the longer I drive it, the more upset I am about the ride quality,” features editor Scott Evans said.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

“It’s kind of a mess at low speeds,” Buyer’s Guide senior editor Matt Taylor agreed. “But handling felt like it cleaned up a little as speed increased.”

Picking the Winner

While on paper these moving castles may present similarly, they do each have their own vibe in how they drive and host their passengers. As for the best overall package, it was a close fight between the Jeep and Ford, but the 2026 Expedition is the winner of this comparison. Not only does it deliver good power while being easy to drive, but it also manages to magic down its bulk so you don’t feel exhausted by keeping track of its dimensions constantly.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

In addition to the comfortable seats and roomy interior, the Expedition also offers thoughtful cargo solutions that instantly heighten daily practicality.

The $77,045 base price is quite reasonable for how much car you get in return. The $6,545 Stealth Performance package is definitely not necessary, so even though the test car’s final MSRP was $84,495, you don’t need to pay that much to get the same experience.

Fuel economy is the only weakness, but no one should go into a full-size SUV expecting stellar returns in that department. Although the Ford’s mileage is pretty bad around town, it makes up for it on the highway. With its relatively modest 23.5-gallon tank, buyers can expect more than 400 miles of range.

“With the Expedition, no single trait elevates the experience,” Gale concluded. “But the Ford offers goodness in many ways, and that’s what makes it a top pick.”

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

4th Place: 2026 Nissan Armada

Pros

  • Comfortable seats
  • Linear power delivery
  • Physical climate buttons

Cons

  • ProPilot Assist lags behind the competition
  • Rough downshifts around town
  • Rides and handles like an old truck

Verdict: Great seats, but the interior is small, and the SUV rides poorly. Outsized and outclassed by others in this comparison.

3rd Place: 2026 GMC Yukon Denali

Pros

  • Tailgate window
  • Old-school feel
  • Super Cruise availability

Cons

  • Poor fuel economy
  • Vertical infotainment screen
  • Thin and flat-feeling seats

Verdict: The V-8 is cozy and familiar, but its fuel economy is atrocious. And the interior quality is disappointing for the high price.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

2nd Place: 2026 Jeep Grand Wagoneer

Pros

  • Great outward visibility
  • Hurricane engine is wonderful
  • Spacious, well-thought-out interior

Cons

  • Poor ride quality
  • Needs better-oriented driver controls
  • Exhausting to fit in small parking lots

Verdict: The Grand Wagoneer seems like it was designed by people who actually use the rear seats. It just lost us with the poor ride quality.

1st Place: 2026 Ford Expedition

Pros

  • Smooth, powerful powertrain
  • Sliding center console
  • All seats comfortable

Cons

  • Massive blind spots
  • Steering wheel is too small
  • Third-row passengers lack armrests

Verdict: A collection of smaller good things makes for one bigger good thing. Say hello to good comfort, a good powertrain, and good usability.

2026 Ford Expedition Platinum 4x4 Specifications2026 GMC Yukon Denali 4WD Specifications2026 Jeep Grand Wagoneer Limited Reserve 4x4 Specifications2026 Nissan Armada Platinum Reserve 4WD Specifications
BASE PRICE$77,045 $86,195 $82,755 $82,795
PRICE AS TESTED$84,495 $99,115 $84,750 $89,100
VEHICLE LAYOUTFront-engine, 4WD, 7-pass, 4-door internal combustion SUVFront-engine, 4WD, 7-pass, 4-door internal combustion SUVFront-engine, 4WD, 7-pass, 4-door internal combustion SUVFront-engine, 4WD, 7-pass, 4-door internal combustion SUV
Powertrain
POWER440 hp @ 5,400 rpm420 hp @ 5,600 rpm420 hp @ 5,200 rpm425 hp @ 5,600 rpm
TORQUE510 lb-ft @ 3,300 rpm460 lb-ft @ 4,100 rpm468 lb-ft @ 3,500 rpm516 lb-ft @ 3,600 rpm
ENGINETwin-turbo port- and direct-injected DOHC 24-valve V-6Direct-injected OHV 16-valve V-8Twin-turbo direct-injected DOHC 24-valve I-6Twin-turbo direct-injected DOHC 24-valve V-6
DISPLACEMENT3,490 cu cm/213.0 cu in6,162 cu cm/376.0 cu in2,993 cu cm/182.6 cu in3,492 cu cm/213.1 cu in
COMPRESSION RATIO10.5:111.5:110.4:110.5:1
REDLINENA5,800 rpm5,300 rpm6,000 rpm
TRANSMISSION10-speed automatic10-speed automatic8-speed automatic9-speed automatic
AXLE/TOP-GEAR/LOW RATIO3.73:1/2.39:1/2.64:13.23:1/2.05:1/2.72:13.92:1/2.51:1/2.64:13.36:1/2.00:1/2.72:1
TOP-GEAR REVS @ 60 MPHNA1,400 rpm1,700 rpm1,500 rpm
Chassis
SUSPENSIONF: control arms, coil springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar
R: multilink, coil springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar
F: control arms, air springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar
R: multilink, air springs, adj shocks, adj anti-roll bar
F: control arms, air springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar
R: multilink, air springs, adj shocks, adj anti-roll bar
F: control arms, air springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar
R: control arms, air springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar
STEERING RATIO20.7:116.8:116.7:117.0:1
TURNS LOCK-TO-LOCK3.63.23.13.1
BRAKESF: 13.8 x 1.3-in vented disc, 2-piston sliding caliper
R: 13.2 x 0.8-in vented disc, 1-piston sliding caliper
F: 13.5 x 1.2-in vented disc, 2-piston sliding caliper
R: 13.6 x 1.0-in vented disc, 1-piston sliding caliper
F: 14.9 x 1.2-in vented disc, 2-piston sliding caliper
R: 14.8 x 0.9-in vented disc, 1-piston sliding caliper
F: 13.8 x 1.2-in vented, 2-piston sliding caliper
R: 13.8 x 0.8-in vented, 1-piston sliding caliper
WHEELS9.0 x 22 in, cast aluminum9.0 x 22 in, cast aluminum9.0 x 22 in, cast aluminum8.5 x 22 in, cast aluminum
TIRESMichelin Primacy LTX
275/50R22 115H XL M+S
Bridgestone Alenza A/S 02
275/50R22 111H M+S
Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season
285/45R22 114 M+S XL
Bridgestone Alenza Sport A/S
275/50R22 111H M+S
Dimensions
WHEELBASE122.5 in120.9 in123.0 in121.1 in
TRACK, F/R68.1/67.8 in68.4/68.1 in68.5/68.3 in68.1/68.0 in
LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT209.9 x 94.6 x 78.0 in210.2 x 81.0 x 76.4 in216.1 x 83.6 x 77.3 in209.6 x 83.3 x 76.6-78.0 in
GROUND CLEARANCE8.7 in7.4 in6.4-10.1 in9.6-11.6 in
APPRCH/DEPART ANGLE21.1/23.5 deg23.2/20.8 deg25.2/24.0 deg23.0-26.0/22.0-25.5 deg
TURNING CIRCLE41.0 ft39.4 ft40.2 ft40.8 ft
CURB WEIGHT (DIST F/R)5,844 lb (50/50%)6,032 lb (50/50%)6,079 lb (52/48%)6,082 lb (52/48%)
WEIGHT TO POWER13.3 lb/hp14.4 lb/hp14.5 lb/hp14.3 lb/hp
HEADROOM, F/M/R40.7/40.0/37.4 in40.4/37.5/38.2 in41.3/40.0/39.0 in39.1/37.8/36.3 in
LEGROOM, F/M/R43.9/41.1/36.5 in44.5/42.0/34.9 in40.9/42.7/36.6 in43.8/39.2/32.9 in
SHOULDER ROOM, F/M/R64.9/64.8/64.2 in65.5/64.7/62.7 in66.1/65.2/64.4 in64.2/63.7/63.1 in
CARGO VOLUME BEHIND F/M/R108.5/60.8/21.6 cu ft122.9/72.5/2.6 cu ft116.7/70.8/27.9 cu ft97.1/56.3/20.4 cu ft
PAYLOAD CAPACITY1,344 lb1,450 lb1,321 lb1,466 lb
TOWING CAPACITY9,200 lb8,000 lb10,000 lb8,500 lb
MotorTrend Test Data
0-30 MPH1.8 sec2.0 sec1.8 sec2.2 sec
0-40 MPH2.9 sec3.3 sec2.9 sec3.4 sec
0-50 MPH4.2 sec4.6 sec4.1 sec4.6 sec
0-60 MPH5.8 sec6.2 sec5.4 sec6.3 sec
0-70 MPH7.7 sec8.1 sec7.1 sec8.1 sec
0-80 MPH10.6 sec10.3 sec9.2 sec10.5 sec
0-90 MPH13.9 sec12.8 sec11.7 sec13.2 sec
0-100 MPH---15.9 sec14.8 sec16.4 sec
PASSING, 45-65 MPH3.2 sec3.2 sec2.8 sec3.2 sec
QUARTER MILE14.6 sec @ 91.6 mph14.6 sec @ 95.9 mph14.1 sec @ 97.9 mph14.7 sec @ 95.0 mph
BRAKING, 60-0 MPH136 ft123 ft137 ft121 ft
LATERAL ACCELERATION0.74 g0.69 g0.70 g0.77 g
FIGURE-EIGHT LAP28.0 sec @ 0.63 g (avg)29.3 sec @ 0.58 g (avg)28.2 sec @ 0.62 g (avg)27.6 sec @ 0.64 g (avg)
Consumer Info
AIRBAGS6: dual front, front side, f/m/r curtain7: dual front, front side, f/m/r curtain, front center6: dual front, front side, f/m/r curtain8: dual front, front side, f/m/r curtain, front knee
BASIC WARRANTY3 yr/36,000 mi3 yr/36,000 mi36 yr/36,000 mi3 yr/36,000 mi
POWERTRAIN WARRANTY5 yr/60,000 mi5 yr/60,000 mi5 yr/60,000 mi5 yr/60,000 mi
ROADSIDE ASSISTANCE5 yr/60,000 mi5 yr/60,000 mi5 yr/60,000 mi3 yr/36,000 mi
FUEL CAPACITY23.6 gal24.0 gal26.5 gal23.6 gal
EPA FUEL ECONOMY,
CITY/HWY/COMBINED
15/22/18 mpg14/18/16 mpg17/23/19 mpg17/19/16 mpg
EPA RANGE425 mi384 mi504 mi401 mi
RECOMMENDED FUEL91 octane91 octane89 octane91 octane
ON SALENowNowNowNow

Stay Ahead of the Curve.

Get the newest car reviews, hottest auto news, and expert analysis of the latest trends delivered straight to your inbox!

By signing up, I agree to the Terms of Use (including the dispute resolution procedures) and have reviewed the Privacy Notice.

I got into cars the way most people do: my dad. Since I was little, it was always something we’d talk about and I think he was stoked to have his kid share his interest. He’d buy me the books, magazines, calendars, and diecast models—everything he could do to encourage a young enthusiast. Eventually, I went to school and got to the point where people start asking you what you want to do with your life. Seeing as cars are what I love and writing is what I enjoy doing, combining the two was the logical next step. This dream job is the only one I’ve ever wanted. Since then, I’ve worked at Road & Track, Jalopnik, Business Insider, The Drive, and now MotorTrend, and made appearances on Jay Leno’s Garage, Good Morning America, The Smoking Tire Podcast, Fusion’s Car vs. America, the Ask a Clean Person podcast, and MotorTrend’s Shift Talkers. In my spare time, I enjoy reading, cooking, and watching the Fast & Furious movies on repeat. Tokyo Drift is the best one.

Read More

Share
ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

You May Also Like

MotorTrend Recommended Stories

Related MotorTrend Content: Politics | Business | Tech | World | News: News | Sports