Shopping for an EV these days is a lot like choosing a phone. There’s Tesla, the ubiquitous choice with a wide-sweeping ecosystem supporting its products, just like buying Apple’s iPhone. Then there’s everyone else, offering a wider variety of models, which is akin to purchasing a device running Android. Some rivals outperform Tesla’s offerings, but the user experience is inconsistent across the market.

In this sense, Tesla has forced itself into the position as an EV benchmark, driving rivals to innovate. Such is the case of the third-generation Mercedes-Benz CLA-Class, available as an all-electric sedan for the first time ever. It comes to market with several advantages against its main competitor, the Tesla Model 3, the first being 800-volt architecture, which allows for wicked-quick charging. Then it gets a new nickel-cobalt-manganese (NCM) battery and a super-slippery body with a claimed coefficient of drag of just 0.21, which allows for incredible road-trip range.

We chose lineup-topping examples of both sedans to compete in this comparison test, pitting the 2027 Mercedes-Benz CLA350 4Matic against the 2026 Tesla Model 3 Performance. A thorough vetting of both vehicles at the track, on the charger, and in real-world conditions revealed a clear winner.

A silver Tesla and a red Mercedes driving side by side on a highway with mountains in the background.
Darren Martin|MotorTrend

By the Test Numbers

The Tesla Model 3 Performance comes out swinging with titanic specs for a compact sedan. Its dual-motor all-wheel-drive powertrain develops a combined 510 hp and 554 lb-ft of torque. Weighing in at 4,020 pounds, it touts a weight-to-power ratio of 7.9 lb/hp.

As a non-AMG model, the Mercedes-Benz CLA350 isn’t quite as focused on going fast. It develops 349 hp and 380 lb-ft of torque from its 4Matic-branded dual-motor AWD system. Tipping the scales at a porkier 4,725 pounds, weight-to-power is 13.5 lb/hp.

With this basic information in mind, it should come as no surprise that the Model 3 Performance wipes the floor with the CLA350 around our test track. The Tesla sets a scorching 0–60-mph time of 2.8 seconds and blasts through the quarter mile in 11.0 seconds at 125.2 mph. It vastly outperforms the CLA350, which needs 4.2 seconds to get from 0 to 60 mph and runs the quarter mile in 12.8 seconds at 109.2 mph.

The Model 3 is equipped with an EV-friendly version of the Pirelli P Zero tire, the PZ4 Elect, T1 to be specific. This furthers the Tesla’s advantage over the Mercedes, which rolls on Bridgestone Turanza 6 MO rubber. It also gets adaptive suspension damping, unlike the CLA350, which has a passive multilink setup, and the Tesla has bigger brakes.

Our track testing confirmed what seems obvious on paper. The Model 3 Performance dusts the CLA around our figure eight with a time of 23.8 seconds to the Merc’s 26.2-second lap. It has superior grip, as well, pulling 0.95 g of maximum lateral grip compared to the CLA’s 0.81 g. Stopping from 60 mph is better, too; the Tesla needs just 110 feet while the Mercedes requires 115.

Two luxury sedans, a red Mercedes and a silver Tesla, parked on a rural road with mountains in the background.
Darren Martin|MotorTrend

Not only do these sedans offer different degrees of performance, but these EVs also present two distinctive driving experiences. The Model 3 Performance is highly configurable, with a comprehensive menu of customizations that allow you to set up the sedan’s on-road behavior (steering, acceleration, suspension settings) to your preferences.

You can set it up to be a relaxed commuter, with its electronically adaptive dampers providing a more refined ride than the Model 3 Premium. You can also stiffen the suspension while cranking acceleration up to Insane mode for more immediacy. Although steering has three degrees of firmness, the standard mode delivers the best balance of weight and feedback. No matter how you set up the steering, the tiller has robotic artificiality to it, taking some of the joy away from exploring the sedan’s handling chops.

Track mode allows you to explore the upper limits of the Model 3 Performance’s capabilities. A handling slider lets you dial in the understeer or oversteer to your preferences, including a setup that’s explicitly for drifting. With an abundance of personalities bundled in a single sedan, the Model 3 aspires to be the only car you need.

The Mercedes-Benz CLA350 has fewer aspects to its character. It behaves like a more traditional European luxury sedan, with a supple ride and good body composure in the corners. Steering is more connected than in the Tesla, with better heft and feedback. There are drive modes, but the degree of customization isn’t quite as deep.

We also aren’t as sold on the CLA’s powertrain tuning. The accelerator is touchy off the line. It’s also sensitive when the car drives over rough pavement. If you’re using regenerative braking and trying to hold speed, imperfections in the road surface can cause your foot to jiggle, causing the Mercedes to jerk.

There’s also the matter of the two-speed automatic transmission connecting the rear motor to the wheels. The shift into second gear takes place around 65 mph, causing a noticeable power dip before a surge of acceleration. When other aspects of the CLA’s on-road dynamics are so polished, these ripples stand out against the rest of its smoothness.

Two vehicles, a silver Tesla and a red Mercedes, driving on a highway under a clear blue sky.
Darren Martin|MotorTrend

On the Open Road and at the Charger

Fortunes flip for the 2026 Tesla Model 3 and Mercedes-Benz CLA350 in our Road-Trip Range and fast charging tests. The Tesla falls short of its EPA-rated 309 miles of range with an as-tested number of 265 miles. Meanwhile, the Mercedes annihilates both the Model 3 and the EPA’s rating of 312 miles with a result of 368 miles of highway driving.

It’s a similar story on a Level 3 fast charger. The CLA’s 800-volt architecture allows it to charge at a 320-kW peak rate, replenishing 198 miles of range in 15 minutes and 322 miles in 30 minutes. The charge from 5 to 80 percent takes just 25 minutes.

This is where our iPhone versus Android analogy comes back into play. Tesla, which uses its (no longer completely) proprietary charging network, has enjoyed a considerable advantage in the EV space due to the ecosystem surrounding its products. Still, there’s no getting around hardware shortcomings, which is the case with this comparison. The times have left the Model 3 behind; it still uses 400-volt architecture. As such, its charging specs are considerably worse than the Mercedes-Benz CLA350’s.

Tesla’s compact adds 142 miles in 15 minutes and 209 miles in 30 minutes. Granted, these figures are good enough for the scores of Model 3 drivers on our roads today, but they can’t be considered the gold standard. That’s especially true when charging from 5 to 80 percent takes 30 minutes, five minutes more than what the CLA needs.

Charger access isn’t much of a problem for the CLA, either. It has a North American Charging System (NACS) port as standard equipment, so it doesn’t need an adapter to use Tesla Supercharger stations. Inside the same door that houses the fast charger, there’s also a J-1772 port for Level 2 charging at speeds up to 9.6 kW. Although you need an adapter to use J-1772 chargers, the Model 3 can charge at a rate of up to 11.5 kW on a Level 2 station.

Interior view of a modern car featuring a steering wheel and large touchscreen display.
William Walker|MotorTrend

A Real-World Winner

So far, the Tesla has the advantage when it comes to driving prowess and performance while the Mercedes cleans up in the range and charging race. There’s one last aspect of these cars to consider: value.

Our 2026 Tesla Model 3 Performance test car stickers for $56,630; the 2027 Mercedes-Benz CLA350 4Matic Electric starts at $51,950 and has been optioned up to $66,280. The Tesla has no additional equipment on it; everything you see (and don’t) comes standard. That includes its large center display, a second-row screen, dual wireless chargers, and ventilated front seats.

The Tesla user interface is far from perfect, there’s no shade for its glass roof, and its minimalistic interior isn’t loved universally by our editors. However, the Model 3 Performance gives you a lot of features for your money, and the soft-touch materials from floor to ceiling beat out the CLA’s cabin, which has a smattering of hard-touch plastics in the mix. Spacious frunk, trunk, and back-seat packaging add to the appeal.

Interior view of a luxury car dashboard featuring a steering wheel, multiple screens, and modern controls.
William Walker|MotorTrend

To get the CLA you see here, you have to tick quite a few boxes. Springing for the AMG Line package costs $2,100, but you must add either the Exclusive or Pinnacle trim, the latter of which is on our test car. That gives you a bunch of nice-to-have features that are mostly already included with or are bettered by the Tesla, such as dual-zone automatic climate control, a rear center armrest with dual cupholders, 64-color LED ambient lighting, front-row wireless charging, keyless entry, parking assistance, and flush door handles. Manufaktur Patagonia Red metallic paint is $1,750, and 19-inch AMG twin five-spoke wheels are a further $600.

The Pinnacle trim, Burmester surround sound system, and head-up display rack up another $7,830. Equipping the Sky Control roof, which tints or becomes transparent electronically in paneled segments, contributes $1,050 to our as-tested price. The bundle of driving assists, which offer less autonomous driving capability than Tesla’s $99/month Full Self-Driving (Supervised), and adaptive LED headlights comes out to $4,070. That’s some old-school German luxury automaker nickel and diming if we’ve ever seen it.

Once again, Tesla’s benchmark status remains intact. The Model 3 Performance has more to offer for less money than the CLA350 4Matic, but the EV-only automaker has been put on notice. If Tesla remains stagnant and continues to offer vehicles without upgrading its electric architecture, a rival could come around and snatch its status.

We hand this win to the 2026 Tesla Model 3 Performance, but the 2027 Mercedes-Benz CLA-Class deserves its due for its excellent battery, range, and charging technology. Just as Apple’s iPhone supremacy looks less clear than ever with the reveal of the Duo, Tesla’s future as the obvious EV leader grows less certain with every new contender like the CLA350 4Matic Electric.

Red luxury sedan with a sporty design driving on a curved road in a desert landscape.
William Walker|MotorTrend

2nd Place: 2027 Mercedes-Benz CLA350 4Matic Electric

Thumbs upPros

  • Stupendous range
  • Blistering charging speeds
  • Pleasant ride and handling

Thumbs downCons

  • Questionable value
  • Two-speed auto hampers refinement
  • Interior smattered with plastics

Verdict: An impressive feat of technology, the Mercedes-Benz CLA350 4Matic leaves something to be desired in terms of value and driving refinement.

A sleek silver Tesla electric car driving on a desert road against a clear blue sky.
William Walker|MotorTrend

1st Place: 2026 Tesla Model 3 Performance

Thumbs upPros

  • Supercar acceleration
  • Impressive features-per-dollar value
  • Configurable for comfort or performance

Thumbs downCons

  • Middling range and charging speeds
  • Ultra-minimalistic interior
  • Just one menu-heavy display

Verdict: Wicked quick and superbly well equipped, the Tesla Model 3 Performance makes up for its slower charging speeds and merely adequate range by being a commendable value.

2027 Mercedes-Benz CLA350 4Matic Specifications2026 Tesla Model 3 Performance Specifications
BASE PRICE$51,950 $56,630
PRICE AS TESTED$66,280 $56,630
VEHICLE LAYOUTFront- and rear-motor, AWD, 5-pass, 4-door electric sedanFront- and rear-motor, AWD, 5-pass, 4-door electric sedan
Powertrain
TOTAL POWER349 hp510 hp
TOTAL TORQUE380 lb-ft554 lb-ft
MOTORSF: permanent-magnet motor, 107 hp, NA lb-ft
R: permanent-magnet motor, 268 hp, 247 lb-ft
F: induction motor, 184 hp, 162 lb-ft
R: permanent-magnet motor, 335 hp, 339 lb-ft
BATTERY85.0-kWh NMC lithium-ion80.0-kWh NCA lithium-ion
TRANSMISSIONS1-speed fixed ratio, 2-speed automatic2 x 1-speed fixed ratio
F/R GEAR RATIO9.98:1/11.00:1 (1st), 5.03:1 (2nd)9.03:1/9.03:1
Chassis
SUSPENSIONF: struts, coil springs, anti-roll bar
R: multilink, coil springs, anti-roll bar
F: control arms, coil springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar
R: multilink, coil springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar
STEERING RATIO15.2:19.0–12.2:1
TURNS LOCK-TO-LOCK2.52.1
BRAKESF: 13.0 x 1.2-in vented disc, 1-piston sliding caliper
R: 12.9 x 0.5-in disc, 1-piston sliding caliper
F: 14.0 x 1.0-in vented disc, 4-piston fixed caliper
R: 13.2 x 0.8-in vented disc, 1-piston sliding caliper
WHEELSF: 7.5 x 19 in, R: 9.0 x 19 in, cast aluminumF: 9.0 x 20 in, R: 10.0 x 20 in, forged aluminum
TIRESBridgestone Turanza 6 MO
F: 225/40R19 93W XL
R: HL255/35R19 99W XL
Pirelli P Zero PZ4 Elect T1
F: 235/35R20 92Y XL
R: 275/30R20 97Y XL
Dimensions
WHEELBASE109.8 in113.2 in
TRACK, F/R63.2/62.0 in62.3/61.4 in
LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT185.9 x 73.0 x 57.8 in185.9 x 76.1 x 56.3 in
GROUND CLEARANCE5.0 in5.0 in
TURNING CIRCLENA38.4 ft
CURB WEIGHT (DIST F/R)4,725 lb (47/53%)4,020 lb (50/50%)
WEIGHT TO POWER13.5 lb/hp7.9 lb/hp
HEADROOM, F/R40.9/36.8 in40.3/37.8 in
LEGROOM, F/R42.2/33.6 in42.7/34.5 in
SHOULDER ROOM, F/R55.6/53.5 in56.7/54.2 in
CARGO VOLUME, F/R1.4/10.3 cu ft3.1/21.0 cu ft
PAYLOAD CAPACITY882 lb915 lb
MotorTrend Test Data
0-30 MPH1.6 sec1.2 sec
0-40 MPH2.3 sec1.7 sec
0-50 MPH3.1 sec2.2 sec
0-60 MPH4.2 sec2.8 sec
0-70 MPH5.5 sec3.6 sec
0-80 MPH7.1 sec4.4 sec
0-90 MPH8.8 sec5.4 sec
0-100 MPH10.7 sec6.7 sec
PASSING, 45-65 MPH2.1 sec1.2 sec
QUARTER MILE12.8 sec @ 109.2 mph11.0 sec @ 125.2 mph
BRAKING, 60-0 MPH115 ft110 ft
BRAKING, 100-0 MPH337 ft319 ft
0-100-0 MPH15.3 sec11.1 sec
LATERAL ACCELERATION0.81 g0.95 g
FIGURE-EIGHT LAP26.2 sec @ 0.72 g (avg)23.8 sec @ 0.88 g (avg)
Consumer Info
AIRBAGS8: dual front, front side, f/r curtain, driver knee, front center9: dual front, front side, f/r curtain, front knee, front center
BASIC WARRANTY4 yr/50,000 mi4 yr/50,000 mi
POWERTRAIN WARRANTY4 yr/50,000 mi (battery: 8 yr/100,000 mi)8 yr/120,000 mi
ROADSIDE ASSISTANCE4 yr/50,000 mi4 yr/50,000 mi
EPA FUEL ECONOMY,
CITY/HWY/COMBINED
120/115/118 mpg-e120/107/114 mpg-e
EPA RANGE312 mi309 mi
70-MPH ROAD-TRIP RANGE368 mi265 mi
MT FAST-CHARGING TEST198 mi @ 15 min, 322 mi @ 30 min142 mi @ 15 min, 209 mi @ 30 min
MAX CHARGING POWER, AC/DC9.6/320 kW11.5/250 kW
ON SALENowNow
Headshot of Darren Martin
Photography byDarren Martin
Former Staff Photographer
For as long as I can remember, I was always interested in cars. I’d spent countless hours playing with toy cars or reading anything and everything I could find out about them. As I got older, I began wanting to make a career out of it, in whatever way possible. I used to think I would end up in engineering or automotive design, but turns out that was trickier than I imagined… Luckily, I also had a passion for photography and after honing my skills at The Creative Circus in Atlanta, a portfolio based school, I turned my enthusiasm into a career, specializing in capturing the beauty and power of cars. As a photographer at MotorTrend, I’ve had the privilege of working on numerous features and projects, showcasing many vehicles and helping share the stories of our highly talented editors. I’m grateful for my journey so far, and I hope to share my passion for cars through my images.
Headshot of William Walker
Photography byWilliam Walker
Deputy Director of Photography
Like many of my coworkers, my love for cars was cemented at a young age, thanks in part to Hot Wheels, car magazines, and every car poster I could afford when the book fair set up shop in my elementary school library. While most kids went straight for Where’s Waldo? and Goosebumps, I was torn between the poster of the Lamborghini Countach and the ’32 Ford hot rod with airbrushed flames on the cowling. In high school, I worked at Bergstrom's Antique Autos, a historic garage in Port Townsend, Washington. Surrounded by nearly a century of automotive history, I immersed myself in cleaning, sorting, and selling car parts and memorabilia. I also spent countless hours flipping through vintage car magazines and can comfortably say that I've looked through every Motor Trend, Car & Driver, Hot Rod, and Sports Car Graphic up until the early 1980s. Around the same time, I picked up photography—naturally, with cars as my main subject. Despite my high school photography teacher's advice to branch out, I stuck to my passion and attended every car show I could find. This led me to the Brooks Institute of Photography in Santa Barbara, California, where I earned a bachelor’s degree with a focus on automotive photography. I began my career at Motor Trend as a photography intern. After freelancing for a few years, I joined the Motor Trend team full-time in late 2010. My passion for cars and photography continues to fuel my work, and I hope it shines through in every shot.

Stay Ahead of the Curve.

Get the newest car reviews, hottest auto news, and expert analysis of the latest trends delivered straight to your inbox!

By signing up, I agree to the Terms of Use (including the dispute resolution procedures) and have reviewed the Privacy Notice.