2026 Audi RS3 First Test: Brilliant Five-Cylinder Sport Sedan Still Delivers
Audi’s compact performance sedan remains blisteringly quick and endlessly entertaining—but its price makes passion a prerequisite.
Pros
- Charismatic five-cylinder engine
- Enormous grip and pace
- More willing to rotate
Cons
- Stiff ride even in Comfort
- Cramped rear seat
- Frustrating touch controls
The Audi RS3 has always been easy to admire and slightly harder to justify. It packs exotic-sounding five-cylinder power, tremendous grip, and all-weather traction into a small four-door sedan, but its stiff ride, tight cabin, and premium price make it less convincing as an everyday luxury car, especially when the less expensive S3 delivers much of the same basic experience.
0:00 / 0:00
Audi’s recent refresh of the RS3 didn’t add power or fundamentally change the drivetrain. Instead, engineers retuned the systems controlling torque distribution, brake vectoring, stability control, and adaptive damping to reduce understeer and make the RS3 rotate more naturally. For 2026, a head-up display, navigation, and traffic sign recognition also became standard.
The result is not measurably quicker than before, but it is slightly more entertaining to exploit. The question is whether that improvement—and the RS3’s singular engine—can outweigh its daily compromises and an as-tested price approaching $80,000.
Same Grip, Better Moves
The RS3 has never lacked grip, but previous versions sometimes made the driver work around their front-heavy, front-drive-based architecture. This one feels more cooperative. Instead of a seeming desire to push wide, it responds with sharper turn-in and can be encouraged to rotate with less trail braking than before.
Our car’s optional Pirelli P Zero R R1 summer tires deserve substantial credit. Their immense grip is aided by the RS3’s unusual reverse-stagger setup, with wider tires at the front than the rear. But Audi’s revised coordination of the adaptive dampers, brake-based torque vectoring, stability control, and rear torque splitter also makes the car more willing to point toward an apex.
The RS3 essentially matched the figure-eight pace of the Cadillac CT4-V Blackwing we previously tested, though the two achieve it differently. The rear-drive Cadillac remains more naturally balanced and communicative, while the Audi relies on enormous front-end grip and sophisticated torque management. It is less transparent but remarkably easy to trust and drive quickly.
The steering is fast and accurate, though feedback remains muted. The optional carbon-ceramic front brakes deliver exceptional stopping performance, but their soft initial bite was less impressive than the result. That said, the pedal firms up deeper into its travel, making it easy to modulate during hard driving.
The suspension provides excellent body control but remains stiff even in Comfort mode. The RS3 still lacks the Blackwing’s natural delicacy, yet it no longer feels as though the driver must fight through understeer before the fun begins.






