2026 Mazda CX-30 2.5 S Aire First Test: Fun Without the Turbo

The new Aire trim keeps the CX-30’s playful edge, even without a turbocharger.

WriterPhotographer

Pros

  • Sharp handling
  • Premium-feeling cabin
  • Smooth automatic tuning

Cons

  • Long braking distances
  • Tight rear seat
  • Clunky infotainment controls

Since its 2020 debut, the Mazda CX-30 has been one of those subcompact SUVs that makes a strong first impression, pairing standout design and a near-premium cabin with the kind of handling most rivals don’t even try to deliver. But our past experience has also shown that beneath its polish, the non-turbo model can feel more pleasant than genuinely sporty, with adequate—if not exciting—power and some compromises in ride, transmission response, and utility. The stylish, naturally aspirated version of Mazda’s baby crossover looks like it should be a class standout, but so far it has come across more as a refined charmer than a driver’s delight.

For 2026, Mazda gives the CX-30 a midcycle refresh aimed less at reinventing the formula than sharpening it. Revised dampers and a brake-actuated limited-slip differential are now standard across the lineup, while non-turbo S models return to their original 186 hp after a brief bump to 191. The lineup also expands with fresh Aire trims for both the naturally aspirated and turbocharged powertrains.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

It’s the non-turbo CX-30 Aire that Mazda sent us, giving us a chance to see what this year’s changes do for the crossover. Although we’ve tested the turbo model a few times since launch, most recently for 2024, we haven’t spent meaningful seat time in a naturally aspirated CX-30 since the model was new.

More Fun Than Expected

Even with Mazda’s updates, the CX-30 doesn’t deliver meaningfully better handling numbers than before. The refreshed version is a touch less grippy in our lateral acceleration test and a hair slower through the figure eight, but the margins are so small they barely matter outside the spreadsheet. And in a segment full of soft-edged subcompact crossovers, the CX-30 is still one of the sharper choices—just look at its nearly one-second figure-eight advantage over the current Subaru Crosstrek Limited.

More important is how it feels. The 2026 CX-30 still comes across less like a typical small crossover than a tall hot hatch, feeling light on its feet and predictable. Although its MacPherson-strut front and torsion-beam rear suspension remains on the soft side, even with this year’s damper revisions, the Mazda is entertaining to hustle, leaning noticeably but rotating willingly when you flick it into a corner.

Better yet, it makes the most of the non-turbo engine’s modest output. The six-speed automatic is smooth and cooperative, quick to downshift, and smart enough to hold second gear when you’re really leaning on it, while standard all-wheel drive and G-Vectoring Control Plus help the CX-30 stay planted and composed. The steering is direct and precise, though our one bone to pick is on-center feel that's a bit light.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

None of this should come as much of a surprise. The last naturally aspirated CX-30s we tested struck much the same balance: sharp and enjoyable but not genuinely sporty. The clearer subjective gain may be in ride quality, where the updated suspension seems to take the edge off the smaller bumps and surface imperfections that previously rattled the CX-30. It still turned choppy over broken interstate concrete, however, so the new dampers haven’t rewritten the ride so much as made it a little easier to live with. There’s only so much you can do with a short wheelbase, after all.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

Acceleration and Braking

Whether it’s the 2026 model or the slightly heavier, slightly more powerful 2020 original, acceleration is essentially a wash. The older CX-30 reaches the quarter-mile traps at 88.3 mph, just 1.2 mph quicker than the new one, but on the whole this is a dead heat.

The Mazda's competition, the Subaru Crosstrek, also packs a 2.5-liter four-cylinder, though in Subaru fashion it’s a horizontally opposed boxer rather than an inline engine. It gives up a bit on paper to the Mazda—182 hp and 178 lb-ft versus the CX-30’s 186 hp and 186 lb-ft—but it’s nearly as quick in the real world, reaching 60 mph in 7.9 seconds and clearing the quarter mile in 16.1 seconds at 88.6 mph.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

None of these numbers is especially impressive, but they’re good enough that passing maneuvers and freeway merges require only a little forethought. There’s also enough torque to momentarily break the front tires loose off the line if you mat the throttle, so the best launches come with a little restraint.

Braking is a bit of a mixed bag. The pedal is firm and inspires confidence, with little nosedive under hard stops, even if the initial bite is a touch grabby. The bigger issue is that the CX-30 simply takes too long to haul down from speed. At 128 feet from 60 mph, the 2026 model needs 9 feet more than the 2020 CX-30 and 5 feet more than the 2024 Subaru Crosstrek, and the ABS also cuts in pretty aggressively right before the car comes to a full stop.

Living With It

For everyday duty, the Aire does a decent job of freshening up the CX-30’s familiar formula. Its white leatherette seats with gray cloth inserts, gray suedelike trim, and light gray stitching give the cabin a brighter, more premium look, while details such as the wireless charger, leather-wrapped wheel and shifter, rear privacy glass, and microsuede dash trim help it feel a little more upscale than most subcompact crossovers. Even the enthusiast angle gets a nod: Sport mode sits right next to the shifter, making it easy to drop the transmission into manual mode and wake the car up, though the lack of paddle shifters remains a miss.

The trade-offs are familiar, too. The 2.5-liter naturally aspirated engine is mostly hushed around town, but rev it out, and the engine hum becomes hard to ignore. Fuel economy is merely OK at 24/31 mpg city/highway, trailing both the old 2020 CX-30 2.5 S’ 25/32 mpg and the 2026 Subaru Crosstrek’s 26/33 mpg, and Subaru’s much longer range only sharpens the contrast.

Space remains another reminder that the CX-30 puts style ahead of usefulness. The second row is tight, though not unusually so for the class, and while cargo room behind the rear seat is competitive enough, the hatch itself is short on thoughtful touches—like bag hooks, which really ought to be here on a trim this far up the ladder.

Then there are the smaller annoyances: the barrage of beeps and dings when you first climb in and an infotainment setup that still feels awkward. The 10.3-inch screen looks smaller than it is because of its wide shape, and although phone mirroring works well enough, Mazda’s rotary controller remains clunky when you must rely on it.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

Is the 2026 CX-30 2.5 S Aire Worth It?

The 2026 Mazda CX-30 2.5 S Aire Edition doesn’t rewrite the script, but it doesn’t need to. Mazda’s changes haven’t made the non-turbo CX-30 quicker or sharper in any measurable way, and the middling fuel economy, tight packaging, awkward infotainment, and surprisingly long stopping distances are still real knocks. But the fundamentals that made this little crossover appealing in the first place are still here: crisp steering, playful chassis balance, standard all-wheel drive, and a cabin that looks and feels a half-step nicer than most of the segment.

That is what makes the Aire work. At $31,345, it still undercuts the 2026 Subaru Crosstrek Limited’s $34,415 while bringing a strong mix of comfort, convenience, and style touches. The Subaru remains the more practical, more feature-rich choice, but if your priorities start with design and end with wanting a small crossover that feels better to drive than most of its peers, the CX-30 Aire has plenty of appeal.

2026 Mazda CX-30 2.5 S Aire Edition Specifications

BASE PRICE

$31,345

PRICE AS TESTED

$33,130

VEHICLE LAYOUT

Front-engine, AWD, 5-pass, 4-door internal combustion SUV

POWERTRAIN

2.5L direct-injected Atkinson-cycle DOHC 16-valve I-4

POWER

186 hp @ 6,000 rpm

TORQUE

186 lb-ft @ 4,000 rpm

TRANSMISSION

6-speed automatic

CURB WEIGHT (F/R DIST)

3,323 lb (60/40%)

WHEELBASE

104.4 in

LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT

173.0 x 70.7 x 61.4 in

TIRES

Bridgestone Turanza EL440
215/55R18 95H M+S

EPA FUEL ECONOMY,
CITY/HWY/COMBINED

24/31/27 mpg

EPA RANGE

343 mi

ON SALE

Now

MotorTrend Test Results

0-60 MPH

7.8 sec

QUARTER MILE

16.0 sec @ 87.1 mph

BRAKING, 60-0 MPH

128 ft

LATERAL ACCELERATION

0.80 g

FIGURE-EIGHT LAP

27.5 sec @ 0.62 g (avg)

Stay Ahead of the Curve.

Get the newest car reviews, hottest auto news, and expert analysis of the latest trends delivered straight to your inbox!

By signing up, I agree to the Terms of Use (including the dispute resolution procedures) and have reviewed the Privacy Notice.

My dad was a do-it-yourselfer, which is where my interest in cars began. To save money, he used to service his own vehicles, and I often got sent to the garage to hold a flashlight or fetch a tool for him while he was on his back under a car. Those formative experiences activated and fostered a curiosity in Japanese automobiles because that’s all my Mexican immigrant folks owned then. For as far back as I can remember, my family always had Hondas and Toyotas. There was a Mazda and a Subaru in there, too, a Datsun as well. My dad loved their fuel efficiency and build quality, so that’s how he spent and still chooses to spend his vehicle budget. Then, like a lot of young men in Southern California, fast modified cars entered the picture in my late teens and early 20s. Back then my best bud and I occasionally got into inadvisable high-speed shenanigans in his Honda. Coincidentally, that same dear friend got me my first job in publishing, where I wrote and copy edited for action sports lifestyle magazines. It was my first “real job” post college, and it gave me the experience to move just a couple years later to Auto Sound & Security magazine, my first gig in the car enthusiast space. From there, I was extremely fortunate to land staff positions at some highly regarded tuner media brands: Honda Tuning, UrbanRacer.com, and Super Street. I see myself as a Honda guy, and that’s mostly what I’ve owned, though not that many—I’ve had one each Civic, Accord, and, currently, an Acura RSX Type S. I also had a fourth-gen Toyota pickup when I met my wife, with its bulletproof single-cam 22R inline-four, way before the brand started calling its trucks Tacoma and Tundra. I’m seriously in lust with the motorsport of drifting, partly because it reminds me of my boarding and BMX days, partly because it’s uncorked vehicle performance, and partly because it has Japanese roots. I’ve never been much of a car modifier, but my DC5 is lowered, has a few bolt-ons, and the ECU is re-flashed. I love being behind the wheel of most vehicles, whether that’s road tripping or circuit flogging, although a lifetime exposed to traffic in the greater L.A. area has dulled that passion some. And unlike my dear ol’ dad, I am not a DIYer, because frankly I break everything I touch.

Read More

Share
ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

You May Also Like

MotorTrend Recommended Stories

Related MotorTrend Content: Sports | Politics | Health | Tech | Entertainment | Business