Our Yearlong Review 2025 Acura Integra Type S Has Been Mostly Bulletproof, With Two Small Exceptions

If you have an Integra Type S and encounter an emissions system and rev-match fault, you aren’t alone.

Writer
039 2025 Integra TypeS

You must go decades and decades back to some of car magazines’ earliest days to reach the origin point of long-term tests like those MotorTrend has long featured as a staple of its evaluation portfolio. The gist of the concept is elementary yet important: Owning a car for a year, driving it in the real world, and performing any scheduled and other needed maintenance just like any owner would, is inherently a far more thorough and informative method of telling readers—particularly people who are interested in purchasing their own example of the vehicle in question—whether a car is any “good.”

That’s especially so in comparison to the first drive media launch events virtually every carmaker on the planet has organized basically forever. At these events, automakers do their utmost to control the quality of the cars on hand to be driven by journalists, with their event planners carefully plotting drive routes and experiences aimed at highlighting their products’ strengths and, at times, blatantly hiding their weaknesses. For example, if a car’s suspension rides like dog crap over small heaves and bumps, you can be sure the company won’t put journalists behind its wheel on anything but the smoothest roads it can find. This is one reason first drive reports might only tell the beginning of a new model’s story.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

What’s the Point?

Everyone who’s performed these year-long tests has encountered some trouble and disappointment along the way; however, automobiles in general have improved so much in the past decade or so that we no longer typically run across many utter disasters, at least not in terms of mechanical reliability and overall user experience. Our yearlong review 2022 Lucid Grand Touring Performance might qualify as an exception, and it was certainly the most troublesome long termer we’ve tested in the past few years, presenting us with several physical and software-related letdowns (our Fisker Ocean probably would’ve given it a run for its money, if it didn’t vanish during the company’s collapse). Then there’s the case of our 2023 Tesla Model Y Long Range that several MT staffers despised, but the reasons behind that were things like design choices, driving dynamics, and build quality rather than mechanical gremlins.

In any case, the good news about our much-liked 2025 Acura Integra Type S long-term test car is that not only has it been a blast to drive for the better part of the past year, it’s also been rock-solid reliable—with only a couple small and quickly rectified problems.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
001 2025 Integra TypeS

What Were They?

As dedicated MT readers might recall from a previous update, we encountered two strange fault messages on the instrument cluster around the 2,000-mile mark; they informed us of an emissions system problem and said the automatic rev-match function was disabled. A visit to our nearest Acura dealer yielded no real answers; the service advisors told us they hadn’t seen these issues before. “The fuel-level sensor might get confused when fuel sloshes around during aggressive driving, so it may trigger the fault as a precaution,” was all they could offer in addition to clearing the codes under warranty.

However, it turns out we’re not the only ones who’ve encountered these problems. After publication of that earlier update, we received email messages from two MotorTrend readers/Integra Type S owners who said the same thing occurred with their cars. One reported, “I’m really interested to hear what you learn about the codes on the long-term Type S. I got that same thing a couple months ago after an autocross, but hours after the fact, and immediately following a fuel up. My car has more miles than yours did, but the dealer gave me the same story as you got, and similarly, the problem hasn’t popped up since.”

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

The other chipped in, “I came across your article searching for information about the two fault issues you mentioned, the rev-match and emissions system. I am experiencing the same issues with only 92 miles on the car. It is currently at the dealer getting a new fuel pump/sending unit, tank, filler tube, and other items associated with the fuel line. Service told me that according to the fault code, this is what needs to be done. I was wondering if you had any follow up info from Acura regarding these faults, as I am curious to know if it had any answers.”

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
015 2025 Integra TypeS

Acura’s Response

After reaching out to Acura HQ here in California, the company took our car back for a week to investigate the cause. Frustratingly, its technicians couldn’t replicate the problems, something that probably sounds familiar to about 80 percent or more of anal-retentive car owners who have ever tried to have an intermittent problem cured by a mechanic.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

Acura advised us: “[We] could not reproduce the fuel-level sensor circuit range/performance trouble code. We also checked for any soft-set connectors, but everything checked out OK. One thing that could have caused the trouble code is repeatedly refilling the tank with just a splash of fuel. Per the owner’s manual (page 623), you should always add a minimum of 1.2 U.S. gallons when refilling, since anything less might not be properly detected by the fuel-level sensor.”

We take that as good advice in general for Integra Type S owners, but we’re still in the dark as to the cause. Our fuel log records confirm we never filled the tank with anything less than 3.2 gallons, and that particular fill-up occurred approximately 1,000 miles prior to the fault codes appearing. Acura also fixed the rattling rear hatch we also complained about; a simple loose trim clip was to blame and was also repaired under warranty.

And?

Nothing. Thousands of miles later, none of the above glitches have recurred. The four-door Integra Type S has already proven itself one of the more enjoyable/practical driver’s cars we’ve held in our possession for this long in quite some time, and it’s been absolutely dependable otherwise. But it hasn’t been perfect because of the above, and we’re duty-bound to let other owners who may have encountered the same things as we have know they’re not alone and—far better news—relatively easy solutions exist.

Back to where we began, that’s entirely the point of tests like this in the first place. But if you own an Integra Type S that’s been afflicted by the same and have experienced ongoing trouble as a result, we’re interested to hear what you have to say.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
036 2025 Integra TypeS

More on Our Long-Term 2025 Acura Integra Type S:

MotorTrend's 2025 Acura Integra Type S

SERVICE LIFE

10 months/10,780 miles

BASE/AS-TESTED PRICE

$54,095/$54,695

OPTIONS

Apex Blue Pearl paint, $600

EPA CITY/HWY/COMB FUEL ECON; COMB RANGE

21/28/24 mpg; 298 miles

AVERAGE FUEL ECON

23.3 mpg

ENERGY COST PER MILE

$0.21

MAINTENANCE AND WEAR

$0: Car inspected by dealer and Honda for emissions-system and auto rev-match fault codes, rattling rear cargo cover (warranty)

DAMAGES

None

DAYS OUT OF SERVICE/WITHOUT LOANER

7

DELIGHTS

Excellent handling, strong acceleration, hatchback practicality

ANNOYANCES

Road noise, parallel parking

RECALLS

None

Stay Ahead of the Curve.

Get the newest car reviews, hottest auto news, and expert analysis of the latest trends delivered straight to your inbox!

By signing up, I agree to the Terms of Use (including the dispute resolution procedures) and have reviewed the Privacy Notice.

I’m not sure if this is bizarre, amusing, interesting, or none of those, but I remember picking up the inaugural issue of Automobile from the magazine rack at a Meijer grocery store in metro Detroit. At 9 years old in 1986, I was already a devoted consumer of car magazines, and this new one with the funky font on the cover caught my eye immediately. Longtime Automobile editor and present-day contributor Michael Jordan despises this story, but I once used his original review of Ferrari’s F40 as source material for a fifth-grade research project. I still have the handwritten report on a shelf at home. Sometimes I text MJ pictures of it — just to brighten his day. I’ve always been a car fan, but I never had any grand dreams, schemes, or plans of making it onto this publication’s masthead. I did earn a journalism degree from Michigan State University but at the time never planned to use it for its intended purpose. Law school made more sense to me for some reason. And then, thankfully, it didn’t. I blame two dates for this: May 1 and May 29, 1994. The former was the day Formula 1 star Ayrton Senna died. As a kid, I’d seen him race years earlier on the streets of Detroit, and though I didn’t follow F1 especially closely, the news of his demise shocked me. It’s the only story I remember following in the ensuing weeks, which just happened to lead right into the latter date. By pure chance, I had earlier accepted a friend’s invitation to accompany him and his father to the Indy 500. You’ve probably heard people say nothing prepares you for the sight of Indianapolis Motor Speedway, especially in real life on race day, with more than 250,000 spectators on the ground. It sounds like clichéd hyperbole, but it’s true. And along with my renewed interest in F1 in the wake of Senna’s death, that first encounter with Indy ignited a passion for motorsports I never expected to find. Without charting the entire course here, the upshot is that it led me to a brief stint working at a racing school, and then to Autoweek, where I worked as a full-time staffer for 13 years, the majority of them as motorsports editor. I was also a tester and reviewer of road cars, a fleet manager, and just about everything in between that is commonplace at automotive enthusiast outlets. Eventually, my work there led me to Automobile in early 2015 — almost 29 years to the day that I first picked up that funky new car mag as my mom checked-off her grocery list. What else do you probably not want to know? I — along with three other people, I’m told frequently — am an avid NBA fan, evidenced by a disturbingly large number of Nikes taking up almost all of my closet space. I enjoy racing/driving video games and simulators, though for me they’ll never replace the real thing. Road cars are cool, race cars are better. I’ve seen the original “Point Break” at least 147 times start to finish. I’ve seen “Top Gun” even more. The millennials on our staff think my favorite decade is the ’80s. They’re wrong. It’s the ’90s. I always have too many books to read and no time to do so. Despite the present histrionics, I do not believe fully autonomous cars will dominate our roads any time soon, probably not for decades. I used to think anyone who didn’t drive a manual transmission wasn’t a real driver, but I was wrong. I wish I could disinvent social media, or at least somehow ensure it is used only for good. And I appreciate being part of Automobile’s proud history, enjoying the ride alongside all of you.

Read More

Share
ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

You May Also Like

MotorTrend Recommended Stories

Related MotorTrend Content: Sports | Health | Entertainment | Business | Tech | World