Battle of Brutes: 2026 Chevrolet Silverado EV Trail Boss vs. Ram 2500 Power Wagon in the Dirt

Two trucks with macho names face off in three off-road challenges to prove which is the more capable rig.

WriterPhotographerPhotographer

The Venn diagram of buyers interested in a windswept electric pickup and a lifted heavy-duty gas-guzzling truck is two distinct circles separated by the distance between Earth and Neptune. But if you look at the attributes of the 2026 Chevrolet Silverado EV Trail Boss and the 2025 Ram 2500 Power Wagon, rather than the buyers, the Venn diagram is pretty much a solar eclipse thirty seconds before you get to take off your cardboard glasses and stare directly at the sun.

Both of these hulking beasts measure nearly 20 feet long and weigh between 3.5 and 4.5 tons. They’ll each tow 10,000 pounds as a show of strength and, when unloaded, struggle to cover 400 miles on the highway despite the Ram’s 31-gallon gas tank and the Chevy’s double-decker 205-kWh battery pack. Prices for both start in the mid-$70s and grew to more than $90,000 for the examples we tested.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

As similar as the key specs are, though, we were ultimately inspired to pit these two against each other based on their names. The Power Wagon is an off-roading legend that earned its reputation on World War II battlefields, and it’s still very much an analog machine with two live axles and two locking differentials. Chevy’s Trail Boss badge can claim no such heritage, as it first appeared 10 years ago on a midsize Colorado, but there’s no shortage of bravado in that name. The antithesis of Power Wagon, the Silverado EV takes a modern approach to off-roading with immense and infinitely controllable electric torque and four-wheel steering. If a truck this big and heavy is going to be called Trail Boss, we want to see it boss around the Power Wagon in the dirt.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

This comparison isn’t about picking the best truck for most buyers. We’ve already established that these two exist for entirely different types of people. Instead, we set out with a narrower question: Which truck packs more off-road capability? In this battle of old-school grit versus modern technology, we found our answer by staging three battles at Michigan’s Holly Oaks ORV Park.

Powering Through a Sandy Hill Climb

We start our competition with what should be an easy, low-stakes test: a hill climb. Our chosen trail isn’t all that steep—maybe 20 degrees at its peak—but it’s covered in a layer of deep, loose sand. In any rig, getting to the top requires powering through the soft stuff with a bit of momentum and a heavy right foot.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

I launch the Ram 2500 up the hill first in four-wheel drive with the rear differential locked. Its 405-hp 6.4-liter V-8 snorts and then roars. The crux of the route comes at a hairpin right where the trail is at its steepest and the sand, chewed up by everyone that’s come before us, is at its worst. My speed dips, but the engine keeps charging hard, and the 33-inch Goodyear Wrangler Duratracs throw up big rooster tails of grit. The rear axle hops violently, shaking the cab as if I’m driving a jackhammer up the hill, but the Ram keeps on making consistent, confident progress to the top.

Senior features editor Aaron Gold takes the wheel of the Silverado EV. After a false start in the truck’s Normal mode, he backs down and selects Terrain mode, a new setting introduced on the Trail Boss that increases the amount of rear-axle steering available and uses the brakes to manage wheelspin and shift torque from side to side.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

The Chevy’s 35-inch Goodyear Wrangler Territory AT tires bite into the surface with less slip than the Ram’s knobbies, making for an authoritative launch. As it approaches the right-hand hairpin, though, the Trail Boss starts losing speed rapidly. Gold has his foot to the floor, but the power gauge indicates the motors are sending just 40 of its maximum 725 horsepower to the wheels. There’s no wheelspin or any other indication that the vehicle is attempting to move forward. Gold tries a couple more times with the same result. The Chevy won’t make it up this relatively tame hill.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

Scrambling Up Mount Magna

Our second test takes place at Mount Magna, a (very) small slice of Moab in Michigan. The poured concrete feature resembles the wind- and water-worn sandstone you find in Utah’s off-roading capital, except that it’s cement gray rather than the majestic blend of pinks, reds, and oranges. The roughly 40-foot-tall “mountain” is peppered with chuckholes and humps that lift wheels off the ground, testing a vehicle’s articulation and traction.

The lines get more difficult as you move from left to right across the face of Mount Magna. I take a harder line, and the Power Wagon easily walks three-quarters of the way up before I get stopped with both front tires in chuckholes. With four tires spinning, the truck shimmies left and right but can’t find the grip to power out of the holes. Backing down a few feet and carrying a little more momentum would have gotten me over the top, but I instead enable easy mode. I shift into low range, disconnect the front anti-roll bar, and lock all the differentials. On the second attempt, the Ram makes it over the crest without so much as a squeak from the tires.

With expectations already lowered, Gold lines up the Trail Boss further to the left where both the grade and the pockets are shallower. The Silverado EV aces that handicapped run, making it up the hill like it’s a highway on-ramp. With that confidence boost under his belt, Gold moves over to the same line I used for the Power Wagon, dragging the rear fascia through the dirt as he rolls onto the rock. Curiously, Chevy dropped the Silverado EV’s air springs when it replaced the RST with the Trail Boss as the top trim for 2026. Instead, the Trail Boss gets a 2-inch hike over other Silverado EVs. That gives it a better approach angle than the Power Wagon, although its clearance is substantially worse.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

As Gold inches the truck up the incline, the Chevy’s traction control works hard. In most cases, it shuts down tire slip before a wheel even makes a full rotation. As long as we’re making forward progress, that’s not necessarily a bad thing, but then the electronic nannies bring the Trail Boss to a halt. The truck won’t spin a single tire, let alone move forward. Gold slaps the accelerator to the floor a few times in frustration, and the power gauge again shows the motors are outputting a fraction of what they’re capable of.

We encountered this same problem a year earlier while trying to climb Mount Magna in a Silverado EV RST. At least back then we weren’t expecting a truck on 24-inch street tires to be a proficient off-roader. In a truck called Trail Boss, though, it’s utterly inexcusable that the truck can decide to stop responding to the driver’s inputs.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

Crawling Over the Stock Rocks

Heading into our final challenge, I’m convinced the Silverado EV is about to get skunked and finish 0-3 in this competition. Holly Oaks’ Stock Rocks is a 100-foot stretch of basketball-sized boulders that test a vehicle’s clearance and a driver’s ability to pick their way across the right driving line. As the name implies, a capable factory off-roader should tiptoe through the granite minefield without much trouble, but to do that, you need to modulate the truck’s speed as you ride up and down each rock. Based on how things went in the hill climb and over at Mount Magna, I’m expecting the Trail Boss to lurch to a halt at the first rock and refuse to go any farther. And even if the computers don’t shut down its progress, the Chevy has 10.0 inches of ground clearance—4.2 less than the Power Wagon—putting that very expensive battery pack much closer to the rocks than the Ram’s underside.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

Predictably, the Power Wagon picks its way through the rock pile with ease. With the transfer case’s low range multiplying torque and the front anti-roll bar disconnected, it’s almost effortless. As easy as it is, though, I can imagine an EV with a well-tuned one-pedal driving mode would make it even easier. Dancing between the two pedals, I manage to prang the Ram’s skidplates a couple times when I come off a rock quicker than I intended.

The Silverado does not get hung up on the first rock as I predicted. In fact, it doesn’t get hung up on anything. The dead accelerator that stopped the Trail Boss on the hill climb and rock scramble doesn’t rear its head here, maybe because we’re essentially on flat ground. With a spotter guiding him, Gold gracefully floats the 8,778-pound anvil across the Stock Rocks on the strength of its smooth, silent, and—at least in this instance—accessible 775 lb-ft of torque. The Silverado EV does drag its belly more often than the Ram 2500, and while each scrape proves harmless, you feel those hits deep in your soul as you wonder how much a replacement battery pack costs. For that reason alone, we’d rather be in the Power Wagon for this challenge, but since the Silverado EV still confidently conquered the Stock Rocks, we’ll call this one a draw.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

Chevy Gets the Last Laugh

Ever since the Silverado EV Trail Boss launched, Chevy has repeated that it didn’t design this truck for hardcore off-roading. Fair enough, but we wouldn’t call these challenges at a suburban off-roading park hardcore. More damning, the Silverado was never stopped by the obstacles themselves. It didn’t run out of traction or get high-centered on a rock. It simply refused to keep moving forward when the driver put his foot to the floor.

The Ram 2500 Power Wagon is an absolute monster in the dirt, as true to the name and the original concept as it’s ever been. We feel obligated to point out that comes with a lot of compromises in daily life. The ride is rough, the steering is vague, the cabin is noisy, and getting in and out could be a CrossFit exercise. Oh, and if Ram’s going to keep calling this thing a Power Wagon, it needs to bolt a Hellcat V-8 between the frame rails sooner than later. A power output that starts with a four just doesn’t cut it in the age of electric overabundance.

Despite disappointing in our off-road trials, the Chevrolet Silverado EV Trail Boss did get the last laugh. While setting up for a sunset photo, the Power Wagon pulled too close to the edge of a pond and sunk deep into soft muck. Gold, still trolling around in the Trail Boss, cackled when he saw the burly Power Wagon solidly stuck. We hooked up a kinetic recovery rope and let the Silverado EV have a moment of glory yanking the Ram free. It may very well be the first, last, and only time a Silverado EV ever bosses around a Power Wagon in the dirt.

2nd Place: 2026 Chevrolet Silverado EV Trail Boss

Pros

  • Four-wheel steering shrinks this big truck on tight trails
  • One-pedal driving smooths out low-speed off-roading
  • Cameras help you avoid big mistakes

Cons

  • Accelerator sometimes doesn’t accelerate
  • Banging the battery off a rock makes you hurt inside
  • Why’d they get rid of the air springs?
ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

Verdict:

The Trail Boss version of the Silverado EV feels no more capable than the street-oriented RST trim that preceded it.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

1st Place: 2025 Ram 2500 Power Wagon

Pros

  • Hugely capable off-road
  • Towering ground clearance
  • Big V-8 sounds like a big V-8

Cons

  • Noisy, rough, and disconnected on the highway
  • Huge step up and down to enter and exit
  • Neither powerful nor a wagon

Verdict:

By staying true to an iconic name, a long-running philosophy, and time-tested hardware, the Ram 2500 Power Wagon hangs onto its crown as the king of big, burly off-roaders.

2026 Chevrolet Silverado EV Trail Boss Specifications

2026 Ram 2500 Power Wagon 4x4 Specifications

BASE PRICE

$72,595

$75,845

PRICE AS TESTED

$93,750

$91,360

VEHICLE LAYOUT

Front- and rear-motor, AWD, 5-pass, 4-door electric truck

Front-engine, 4WD, 5-pass, 4-door internal-combustion truck

Powertrain

TOTAL POWER

725 hp

405 hp @ 5,600 rpm

TOTAL TORQUE

775 lb-ft

429 lb-ft @ 4,000 rpm

ENGINE

---

Port-injected OHV 16-valve V-8

DISPLACEMENT

---

6,417 cu cm/391.6 cu in

COMPRESSION RATIO

---

10.0:1

REDLINE

---

5,800 rpm

MOTORS

F: permanent-magnet motor, NA hp, NA lb-ft
R: permanent-magnet motor, NA hp, NA lb-ft

---

BATTERY

205.0-kWh NCMA lithium-ion

---

TRANSMISSION(S)

2 x 1-speed fixed ratio

8-speed automatic

GEAR RATIOS

13.26:1/11.63:1 (front/rear)

4.10:1/2.75:1/2.64:1 (axle/top gear/low)

TOP-GEAR REVS @ 60 MPH

---

1,800 rpm

Chassis

SUSPENSION

F: control arms, coil springs, anti-roll bar
R: control arms, coil springs, anti-roll bar

F: live axle, coil springs, disconnecting anti-roll bar
R: live axle, coil springs, anti-roll bar

STEERING RATIO

17.0:1

14.2:1

TURNS LOCK-TO-LOCK

3.3

5.7

BRAKES

F: 14.0 x 1.6-in vented disc, 2-piston sliding caliper
R: 14.0 x 0.8-in vented disc, 1-piston sliding caliper

F: 14.2 x 1.5-in vented disc, 2-piston sliding caliper
R: 14.1 x 1.3-in vented disc, 2-piston sliding caliper

WHEELS

8.5 x 18 in, cast aluminum

8.0 x 17 in, forged aluminum

TIRES

Goodyear Wrangler Territory AT TPC 4014
LT285/75R18 129/126S M+S

Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac
LT285/70R17 121/118Q M+S

Dimensions

WHEELBASE

145.7 in

149.3 in

TRACK, F/R

68.5/68.6 in

68.7/68.1 in

LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT

233.1 x 83.8 x 79.9 in

238.8 x 83.4 x 80.9 in

GROUND CLEARANCE

10.0 in

14.2 in

APPRCH/DEPART ANGLE

31.6/25.1 deg

29.4/26.0 deg

TURNING CIRCLE

42.2 ft

48.2 ft

CURB WEIGHT (DIST F/R)

8,778 lb (51/49%)

7,370 lb (58/42%)

WEIGHT TO POWER

12.1 lb/hp

18.2 lb/hp

HEADROOM, F/R

43.9/38.7 in

40.9/39.8 in

LEGROOM, F/R

44.8/44.3 in

40.9/40.2 in

SHOULDER ROOM, F/R

64.9/63.8 in

65.9/65.6 in

PICKUP BOX VOLUME

57.5 cu ft (10.7 cu ft frunk)

57.5 cu ft

PICKUP BOX L x W x H

70.6 x 65.4 x 22.2 in

76.3 x 66.4 x 20.1 in

WIDTH BET WHEELHOUSES

49.4 in

51.0 in

CARGO LIFT-OVER HEIGHT

39.1 in

39.7 in

PAYLOAD CAPACITY

1,500 lb

1,195 lb

TOWING CAPACITY

10,000 lb

10,550 lb

MotorTrend Test Data

0-30 MPH

1.8 sec

2.4 sec

0-40 MPH

2.6 sec

3.7 sec

0-50 MPH

3.4 sec

5.4 sec

0-60 MPH

4.4 sec

7.2 sec

0-70 MPH

5.5 sec

9.5 sec

0-80 MPH

6.9 sec

12.4 sec

0-90 MPH

8.7 sec

15.8 sec

0-100 MPH

10.8 sec

---

PASSING, 45-65 MPH

1.9 sec

3.8 sec

QUARTER MILE

12.9 sec @ 108.8 mph

15.5 sec @ 89.3 mph

BRAKING, 60-0 MPH

134 ft

138 ft

LATERAL ACCELERATION

0.73 g

0.70 g

FIGURE-EIGHT LAP

27.5 sec @ 0.67 g (avg)

29.4 sec @ 0.57 g (avg)

Consumer Info

AIRBAGS

6: dual front, front side, f/r curtain

6: dual front, front side, f/r curtain

BASIC WARRANTY

3 yr/36,000 mi

3 yr/36,000 mi

POWERTRAIN WARRANTY

3 yr/36,000 mi
(8 yr/100,000 mi battery)

10 yr/1060,000 mi

ROADSIDE ASSISTANCE

5 yr/60,000 mi

5 yr/60,000 mi

FUEL CAPACITY

---

31.0 gal

EPA FUEL ECONOMY,
CITY/HWY/COMBINED

Not tested

Not tested

EPA RANGE (MFR EST)

478 mi

Not tested

70-MPH ROAD-TRIP RANGE

395 mi

---

MT FAST-CHARGING TEST

133 mi @ 15 min, 220 mi @ 30 min

---

MAX CHARGING POWER, AC/DC

19.2/350 kW

---

RECOMMENDED FUEL

---

87 octane

ON SALE

Now

Now

Stay Ahead of the Curve.

Get the newest car reviews, hottest auto news, and expert analysis of the latest trends delivered straight to your inbox!

By signing up, I agree to the Terms of Use (including the dispute resolution procedures) and have reviewed the Privacy Notice.

I fell in love with car magazines during sixth-grade silent reading time and soon realized that the editors were being paid to drive a never-ending parade of new cars and write stories about their experiences. Could any job be better? The answer was obvious to 11-year-old me. By the time I reached high school, becoming an automotive journalist wasn’t just a distant dream, it was a goal. I joined the school newspaper and weaseled my way into media days at the Detroit auto show. With a new driver’s license in my wallet, I cold-called MotorTrend’s Detroit editor, who graciously agreed to an informational interview and then gave me the advice that set me on the path to where I am today. Get an engineering degree and learn to write, he said, and everything else would fall into place. I left nothing to chance and majored in both mechanical engineering and journalism at Michigan State, where a J-school prof warned I’d become a “one-note writer” if I kept turning in stories about cars for every assignment. That sounded just fine by me, so I talked my way into GM’s Lansing Grand River Assembly plant for my next story. My child-like obsession with cars started to pay off soon after. In 2007, I won an essay contest to fly to the Frankfurt auto show and drive the Saturn Astra with some of the same writers I had been reading since sixth grade. Winning that contest launched my career. I wrote for Jalopnik and Edmunds, interned at Automobile, finished school, and turned down an engineering job with Honda for full-time employment with Automobile. In the years since, I’ve written for Car and Driver, The New York Times, and now, coming full circle, MotorTrend. It has been a dream. A big chunk of this job is exactly what it looks like: playing with cars. I’m happiest when the work involves affordable sporty hatchbacks, expensive sports cars, manual transmissions, or any technology that requires I learn something to understand how it works, but I’m not picky. If it moves under its own power, I’ll drive it.

Read More

Share
ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

You May Also Like

MotorTrend Recommended Stories

Related MotorTrend Content: News: News | Tech | Business | World | Sports | Entertainment