Screaming Meemie: 2009 Honda S2000 CR Retro Rewind Review
Revisiting the hardest-core iteration of Honda’s notoriously high-strung, F1- and bike-racing-inspired gem of a roadster.
The S2000 was Honda’s 50th birthday present to itself in 1999. It was a modern reinterpretation of what had started as a motorcycle company’s very first automobile: the S500 roadster. That tiny two-seater’s 531cc four-banger revved to 8,000 rpm to produce 43 hp. It doesn’t sound like much, but it pencils out to 1.3 hp/cubic inch back in 1963. In those days, America’s most power-dense engines (all big-block V-8s) were crowing about 1 hp/cu in.
The new S2000 was an ideal successor to the S500 in that its high-strung engine also revved to the moon—the initial S2000’s 2.0-liter spun to 9,000 rpm. That $32,415 car’s 240 naturally aspirated horses set an engine-power-density record (1.97 hp/cu in) that stood for a decade until the quarter-million-dollar Ferrari 458 Italia’s 4.5-liter flat-plane V-8 snatched it away in 2010 (producing 2.05 hp/cubic inch).
The S2000’s all-steel construction includes a “high X-bone frame” that looks like two tuning forks sharing a common handle that serves as the top of the center console. Front/mid-mounting of the engine and transmission bestows a 50/50 weight balance, and a Torsen limited-slip differential helps put the power down judiciously.
Drive it Like You Hate It
“Imagine if Formula One engineers built a sports car,” our own Chuck Shifsky mused in an early pre-launch review. “Well, they did, and it’s Honda’s new S2000.” Eventually we got our hands and instruments on the car, and indeed it outperformed its chief rivals, the BMW Z3 2.8 and Porsche Boxster, while undercutting them in price.
Period MotorTrend test results.
But the kudos came with caveats. Shifsky again: “The S2000 numbers came after launching at 8,000 rpm (producing little tire spin) and shifting at 8,300. On one run, we launched and shifted at 5,500; the 0-60 time rose to more than 11 seconds.” That review closed with this recommendation: “Our advice is to treat the S2000 like you hate it and you’ll get the most out of it. We did and we loved every minute of it.”
Personal memories of driving those early press cars when new corroborate the sense that the S2000 was most definitely not an in-town rig. The revs required to sense any semblance of sporting performance can only be comfortably explored well out of earshot of friends, neighbors, and the local constabulary. But out there, feeling the acceleration perk up as the VTEC cams shift over (at about the point most normal engines redline) is quite the rush. The transmission also stands out as having been the most utterly sublime in the car world back in the day, with few rivals having come along in the interim.
A midcycle upgrade for 2004 sought to domesticate the engine, if only very slightly. Its bore increased from 84.0 to 90.7mm, transforming it from an oversquare to an undersquare design. The resulting 10 percent displacement boost (to 2.2 liters) helped increase peak torque by 9 lb-ft while lowering the peak by 1,000 revs, to 6,500 rpm. The redline dropped to 8,200 rpm, and although there were 3 fewer horses, they peaked 500 rpm earlier, all in the name of making the performance more accessible.
Other changes included softer rear springs, revised damping, a wider rear track, taller and wider tires, new brake pads, carbon-fiber transmission synchronizers, and a larger, stronger Torsen diff. Peak performance pretty closely mirrored that of our initial 2000 test car, but the aim had been to make the car more tractable around town.




