Tested: Is the 2026 Toyota bZ Good or Just Slightly Less Mediocre?
Toyota’s EV SUV gets some useful changes this year, yet it’s still a head-scratcher.Pros
- Greatly improved acceleration and range
- Comfortable ride
- Nifty parking camera
Cons
- Sluggish fast-charging speed
- Awkward interior
- Two-motor models still can’t crack 300-mile mark
Has Toyota done enough to transform what was formerly known as the bZ4X into the 2026 bZ? We criticized the outgoing version of this electric SUV for its poor range, slow recharging, and bizarre interior layout (perhaps that’s what “bZ” stands for). For 2026, Toyota has attempted to address these concerns and has truncated the tongue-twister name for good measure.
0:00 / 0:00
Our First Drive of the 2026 bZ left us cautiously intrigued, enthralled by the extra range and power but puzzled by the interior changes. It was time to spend a couple of weeks with the Toyota bZ, strap on our testing gear, and figure out once and for all if the thing is worth buying.
The Critical Number We Don’t Know
Toyota frustrated our efforts by waiting to announce firm pricing. As we write this, the company has only told us the bZ will start around $40,000 including the destination charge, which would indicate a price increase of around $1,500 compared to the 2025 bZ4X.
But that’s the basic XLE front-drive model, which in its reconstituted bZ form has less range and power for 2026. (Yes, that’s right, someone at Toyota figured out a way to make the basic bZ4X even less compelling. And people say innovation is dead!) The version we’re testing here is the Limited AWD model, which takes the bZ in the right direction with more power and range. But at what cost? We don’t know.
Enough equivocating; let’s look at some numbers. The dual-motor bZ gets a power boost over the old bZ4X , jumping 124 hp to 338. (Toyota has not published a combined torque rating, but summing torque values usually comes pretty close. In this case, that gives us about 323 lb-ft.)
We expected improved acceleration, and we got it. The bZ zinged to 60 in 4.4 silent seconds, much more in keeping with what we expect from a dual-motor EV than the old bZ4X’s 5.8-second run, and it delivered an action-packed launch as an unexpected bonus. With the VSC Off button pressed (stability control never entirely disengages), the bZ bolted from the gate like an ill-tempered stallion, and we could actually feel it scrabbling for traction. The eager bZ ran into its own speed limiter in the quarter mile, which it covered in 13.1 seconds at 101.7 mph, a nice improvement over the old bZ4X’s 14.5 at 95.9.
What effect does this newfound power have on range and charging? All bZs save for that pathetic base model now have a slightly bigger battery—74.7 kWh versus the prior 72.8 kWh—and that, combined with other improvements, brings a notable bump in range. Per the EPA, the all-wheel-drive bZ goes between 278 and 288 miles depending on trim level (278 for the Limited we drove), up from 222– 228 in the bZ4X. The front-drive Limited model, with the bigger battery, cracks the 300-mile barrier by 14 miles. Oh, and the base model’s battery shrinks from 71.4 kWh to 57.7, for an EPA-rated range of 236 miles.
We didn’t subject the old AWD bZ4X to our Road-Trip Range test, in which we run a steady 70 mph until the battery gets down to 5 percent, but its mechanical twin, a Subaru Solterra Touring AWD, managed 196 miles, while the new bZ returned 222 miles. Like the EPA rating, it’s an OK number but not a standout.




