2025 Volvo EX40 Twin Motor First Test: Keeping Things Current
A new name, slightly bigger battery, and more efficient motors advance Volvo’s Compact E-SUV.Pros
- Nice handling
- Swift acceleration
- Nice infotainment
Cons
- Relatively short driving range
- Average charging times
- Doesn’t move the needle much overall
Meet the 2025 Volvo EX40, a thoroughly rebadged XC40 Recharge that also has a few other upgrades up its sleeve. (Note that its swoopy-roofline C40 sibling will get its own rechristening as EC40 after sitting out the 2025 model year.) Have the changes targeted our primary complaints with the XC40 Recharge—primarily range, charging speed, and price? Well, the short answer is, kinda. The popular Twin Motor variant gets the bigger 82-kWh battery (79 usable) formerly reserved for the Single Motor Extended Range models, but that’s only a whopping 4-kWh improvement. And charging speed jumped from 150 to 200kW last year, good for a claimed 10–80 percent charging time of just 28 minutes. Our results may have differed.
Why It’s Important
The XC40 Recharge was Volvo’s rapid response to electrification—an ICE-vehicle conversion that got an oar in the water right quick. As Volvo readies its range of dedicated EVs (EX30, EX90, and ES90), the changes made to the 40-series range for 2025 look like what they are—stopgap spiffs. In addition to the battery upgrade, there’s the new Sand Dune paint seen here with a contrasting black roof that’s newly standard on top models (now dubbed Ultra instead of Ultimate, which is a $3,700 upgrade from the midlevel Plus package). Our Dawn Fusion Microtech upholstery set off by cloth accents is also new and vaguely emulates wetsuit material. It’s a pleasing look that, along with the open-pore woodgrain inserts, manages to appear upscale despite the quaintly tiny infotainment screen. These modest changes warrant evaluation as we continually assess the nine electric luxury compact SUVs in MotorTrend’s Ultimate Car Rankings (where the EX40 ranks fifth).
Pros: What We Like
The EX40’s driving and handling performance is great. Volvo’s new permanent-magnet rear- and AC-induction front-motor setup yielded darn near the exact same swift results as they did in our 2024 C40 Recharge Twin—4.0 seconds to 60 mph and 12.7 through the quarter mile for both, though the XC40 scored 4–5 percent better braking and handling numbers on identical tires (suggesting our Michigan test track is marginally grippier than our California one). The No. 1–ranked Genesis GV60 is a few tenths quicker in a straight line, equivalent in lateral grip, and slightly worse off for braking. The larger, lighter, better-selling Tesla Model Y Dual Motor Long Range runs about a half-second slower with equivalent handling.
Within its class, the Volvo EX40 measures 3 to 13 inches shorter in length but stands marginally taller, delivering both spacious upright seating and competitive cargo space in an easier-to-park package. The infotainment system proved responsive, well organized, and relatively easy to master.

