By Design: 2017 Porsche Panamera

Not yet a beauty, but no longer a beast
Writer

Last month I characterized the first Panamera sedan as "ugly." Any production Porsche is exceptionally well-made, even those poorly engineered, and even something as artless as the 911 can become an icon when great development triumphs over bad design. But those first hump-backed Panameras were conceived on the whim of the then Porsche chief executive so he could wear a hat in the backseat—not a solid start.

The Panamera here is a totally new design. It's still far from beautiful but definitely no longer ugly. The upper structure is actually quite handsome, with a good profile and the necessary taper toward the back in plan view, but the lower body suffers from being too 911-like. That's a mistake, one made all too often by powerful CEOs whose business acumen may be admirable but doesn't remotely qualify them to assess, amend, or approve designers' work any more than it qualifies them to tell the powertrain group that they want the crankshaft main bearing diameters increased because it "feels better" to them.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

Keeping a look because it was once successful shows a pitiful lack of imagination and courage. Making all-new Camaros resemble those from the '60s is silly, but many others have followed suit. For a long time BMW executives insisted on a boat-like prow because the company had commercial success with grilles leaning forward at the top, so designers' propositions to reverse that inclination for better aerodynamics were systematically nixed. That a Porsche sedan would be shaped like a 911 is completely beside the point. I've seen photos of a Porsche-built four-door 911, changed in size and proportion but not a bit in the grand lines of its profile. That idea was happily round-filed, but vestiges remain in the 2017 Panamera, especially in the rear.

Every time I've driven a Panamera, I've enjoyed the experience whatever the engine, and I suspect this latest iteration will be even better. Certainly the cleaner, simpler cockpit with fewer switches and buttons will be more agreeable to live with, and, as always, once you're behind the wheel you can't see the exterior and don't have to care whether it's beautiful or not. But when you park and get out, it's always nice to want to stop and look at your car before you go about your business. The year the Panamera first arrived, it didn't win an All-Star award, despite its many virtues. This one's not a shoo-in as an All-Star, but at least it has a chance.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

1.Perhaps these clear covers are meant to resemble 911 headlamps. In fact, they are quite generic, without character or visual interest.

2.The twin character lines on the hood are pleasant …

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

3.... but the hood is too humped and visually shortens the car. The whole front end lacks clear identity, so it's good the Porsche badge is prominent.

4.The headlamp covers are set into the blobby front surfaces, leaving these little walls inboard, which help the composition a lot.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

5.A side daylight opening trimmed in bright metal is a positive element on an otherwise undecorated external envelope.

6.Breaking the Panamera's side character line with an obtrusive door handle seems like a mistake.

7.Fairly broad rear shoulders and a radiused character line help eliminate the feeling that the car has an inflated or ballooned form.

8.The vertical edge of the engine compartment heat outlet aligns with the door leading edge, but might have been better at an angle to match the wheel opening.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

9.This hard edge surrounding the grille gives the Porsche's front end some definition.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

10.Black air inlets, with hints of body color between them, seem to be desperately ordinary.

11.The front fender cross-section radius is almost as fat as that of the 356 model from the 1950s.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

12.Porsche makes mirrors big enough to suit serious drivers who keep track of what's happening behind them. These are very well placed, too.

13.This single tight radius saves the entire car from looking like something popped out of a jelly mold.

14.A wonderfully pure roof profile helps us forget the misbegotten shape of the first Panamera.

15.The backlight unfortunately limits rear visibility.

16.Notice the Mercedes-style ribbing of the taillight lenses, a trick that looks nice and helps keep the lamps clean.

17.Shaping black underbody into the bumper cuts visual height effectively.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

18.Four big pipes, very nicely placed, confirm that the Panamera is a performance car.

19.Notice the clever little bend around the rear reflectors that help the rib transition from the rear face to the body sides.

20.So many spokes going in so many directions, this wheel look seems inappropriate for a sedan—or a four-door "coupe."

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

21.The entire body is undergirded with inconspicuous black panels that make the car seem sleeker and slimmer than it really is. Nicely done.

22.Simple, fat-rimmed, and slightly dished, the steering wheel announces Porsche's concern with the driver and his or her needs.

23.Properly clustered in front of the driver, classically round, and easy to read, the instruments are part of a long, proud heritage.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

24.The large screen, on the other hand, is completely contemporary and extremely practical.

25.Clean, handsome, and intelligent, the simple design of the passenger's side of the panel is appreciated.

Stay Ahead of the Curve.

Get the newest car reviews, hottest auto news, and expert analysis of the latest trends delivered straight to your inbox!

By signing up, I agree to the Terms of Use (including the dispute resolution procedures) and have reviewed the Privacy Notice.

Robert Cumberford is a designer who became a writer by accident. His race report on the 12 Hours of Sebring was published when he was an eighteen-year-old Art Center student in 1954. Subsequently he has published thousands of articles on cars and airplanes, in American, Asian, English, European, and South American magazines. He contributed to several books, including the entire text of the well-reviewed Auto Legends, now available in five translated editions -- French, German, Spanish, Italian, and Polish in addition to the original English version. In 1985, Automobile Magazine founder David E. Davis, Jr., invited him to be one of two executive editors when Automobile was in the planning stages. Cumberford demurred, saying he knew nothing about magazine production and claims he still doesn’t, except that it’s important to meet deadlines. He contributed features from the beginning and began his popular “By Design” column in the sixth issue, September 1986.

In car design, Cumberford was even more a youthful prodigy. He sketched the body for the first car ever built to his designs when he was a fifteen-year-old Los Angeles high-school student. That car, the Parkinson Jaguar Special, is still active in historic racing sixty years after it was created. Hired directly by General Motors’ legendary Vice President of Design, Harley J. Earl, Cumberford became a professional car designer at nineteen. Leaving Detroit, he returned to California to attend UCLA to study philosophy. He rejoined the automotive world in the early 1960s and has continued to create new automotive shapes since then, always as an independent design consultant. He has lived and worked in six of the fifty United States and in France, Mexico, and Switzerland. The range of his design projects includes both racing and touring cars, trucks, aircraft, boats, hovercraft, and even ecological architecture.

He is known worldwide for strong opinions but is well-respected in the design world because it is known that he is always completely honest in his views, with no agenda other than respect for good design and good designers. “There’s no ad hominem,” he says, “I judge the design, not the designers. There are designers I really like personally who’ve been credited with designs I heartily dislike -- for reasons I always state very clearly -- and designs I love done by people with whom I have absolutely no affinity. Except that we both like their work.”

Read More

Share
ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

You May Also Like

Related Pages

Related MotorTrend Content: New York Auto Show | Awd Cheapest | 7 Seater Cheapest | Off Road Vehicles | Truck Of The Year Award | Full Size Gas Mileage